专栏名称: 金融学前沿论文速递
精选推送国内外最前沿的金融学论文。服务学术研究、投融资实务和政策决策,推动国内金融学研究快速与国际接轨。关注人数超过6万。本号由上海财经大学讲席教授徐龙炳、陆蓉带领的“上财金融创新团队”负责。
目录
相关文章推荐
武志红  ·  一夜之间,他口碑逆转了? ·  昨天  
樊登读书  ·  有对的磁场,才有好的关系 ·  3 天前  
樊登读书  ·  有对的磁场,才有好的关系 ·  3 天前  
壹心理  ·  婚姻中最受欢迎的伴侣类型TOP1 ·  1 周前  
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  金融学前沿论文速递

【顶级期刊目录】JF 2019年6月目录摘要

金融学前沿论文速递  · 公众号  ·  · 2019-05-15 20:59

正文


  • 这是“金融学前沿论文速递”第785篇推送

  • 编辑:朱思源 审核:兰袁

  • 仅用于学术交流,原文版权归原作者和原发刊所有


目录
  • High‐Frequency Trading around Large Institutional Orders

  • Liquidity Risk and the Dynamics of Arbitrage Capital

  • Employee Stock Option Exercise and Firm Cost

  • Brokers versus Retail Investors: Conflicting Interests and Dominated Products

  • Venture Capital and Capital Allocation

  • Trade Network Centrality and Currency Risk Premia

  • Optimal Contracting, Corporate Finance, and Valuation with Inalienable Human Capital

  • Leverage and the Cross‐Section of Equity Returns

  • Household Debt Overhang and Unemployment

  • Financial Markets, the Real Economy, and Self‐Fulfilling Uncertainties


1

High‐Frequency Trading around Large Institutional Orders

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Vincent van Kervel (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile)

Albert J. Menkveld (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute)


Abstract

Liquidity suppliers lean against the wind. We analyze whether high‐frequency traders (HFTs) lean against large institutional orders that execute through a series of child orders. The alternative is HFTs trading with the wind, that is, in the same direction. We find that HFTs initially lean against these orders but eventually change direction and take positions in the same direction for the most informed institutional orders. Our empirical findings are consistent with investors trading strategically on their information. When deciding trade intensity, they seem to trade off higher speculative profits against higher risk of being detected and preyed on by HFTs.


2

Liquidity Risk and the Dynamics of Arbitrage Capital

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Péter Kondor (London School of Economics and CEPR)

Dimitri Vayanos (London School of Economics, CEPR, and NBER)


Abstract

We develop a continuous‐time model of liquidity provision in which hedgers can trade multiple risky assets with arbitrageurs. Arbitrageurs have constant relative risk‐aversion (CRRA) utility, while hedgers' asset demand is independent of wealth. An increase in hedgers' risk aversion can make arbitrageurs endogenously more risk‐averse. Because arbitrageurs generate endogenous risk, an increase in their wealth or a reduction in their CRRA coefficient can raise risk premia despite Sharpe ratios declining. Arbitrageur wealth is a priced risk factor because assets held by arbitrageurs offer high expected returns but suffer the most when wealth drops. Aggregate illiquidity, which declines in wealth, captures that factor.


3

Employee Stock Option Exercise and Firm Cost

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Jennifer Carpenter (New York University)

Richard Stanton (University of California, Berkeley)

Nancy Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)


Abstract

We develop an empirical model of employee stock option exercise that is suitable for valuation and allows for behavioral channels. We estimate exercise rates as functions of option, stock, and employee characteristics using all employee exercises at 88 public firms, 27 of them in the S&P 500. Increasing vesting frequency from annual to monthly reduces option value by 11% to 16%. Men exercise faster, reducing value by 2% to 4%, while top employees exercise slower, increasing value by 2% to 7%. Finally, we develop an analytic valuation approximation that is more accurate than methods used in practice.


4

Brokers versus Retail Investors: Conflicting Interests and Dominated Products

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Mark Egan (Harvard Business School)


Abstract

I study how brokers distort household investment decisions. Using a novel convertible bond data set, I find that consumers often purchase dominated bonds—cheap and expensive otherwise‐identical bonds coexist in the market. Brokers are incentivized to sell the dominated bonds, typically earning two times greater fees for selling them. I develop and estimate a broker‐intermediated search model that rationalizes this behavior. The estimates indicate that costly search is a key friction in financial markets, but the effects of search costs are compounded when brokers are incentivized to direct the search of consumers toward high‐fee inferior products.


5

Venture Capital and Capital Allocation

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Giorgia Piacentino (Columbia University and CEPR)


Abstract

I show that venture capitalists' motivation to build reputation can have beneficial effects in the primary market, mitigating information frictions and helping firms go public. Because uninformed reputation‐motivated venture capitalists want to appear informed, they are biased against backing firms—by not backing firms, they avoid taking low‐value firms to market, which would ultimately reveal their lack of information. In equilibrium, reputation‐motivated venture capitalists back relatively few bad firms, creating a certification effect that mitigates information frictions. However, they also back relatively few good firms, and thus, reputation motivation decreases welfare when good firms are abundant or profitable.


6
Trade Network Centrality and Currency Risk Premia

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Robert Richmond (NYU Stern School of Business)


Abstract

I uncover an economic source of exposure to global risk that drives international asset prices. Countries that are more central in the global trade network have lower interest rates and currency risk premia. To explain these findings, I present a general equilibrium model in which central countries' consumption growth is more exposed to global consumption growth shocks. This causes the currencies of central countries to appreciate in bad times, resulting in lower interest rates and currency risk premia. Empirically, central countries' consumption growth covaries more with world consumption growth, further validating the proposed mechanism.


7
Optimal Contracting, Corporate Finance, and Valuation with Inalienable Human Capital

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Patrick Bolton (Columbia University and NBER)

Neng Wang (Columbia University and NBER)

Jinqiang Yang (School of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)


Abstract

A risk‐averse entrepreneur with access to a profitable venture needs to raise funds from investors. She cannot indefinitely commit her human capital to the venture, which limits the firm's debt capacity, distorts investment and compensation, and constrains the entrepreneur's risk sharing. This puts dynamic liquidity and state‐contingent risk allocation at the center of corporate financial management. The firm balances mean‐variance investment efficiency and the preservation of financial slack. We show that in general the entrepreneur's net worth is overexposed to idiosyncratic risk and underexposed to systematic risk. These distortions are greater the closer the firm is to exhausting its debt capacity.


8
Leverage and the Cross‐Section of Equity Returns

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Hitesh Doshi (University of Houston)

Kris Jacobs (University of Houston)

Praveen Kumar (University of Houston)

Ramon Rabinovitch (University of Houston)


Abstract

Building on theoretical asset pricing literature, we examine the role of market risk and the size, book‐to‐market (BTM), and volatility anomalies in the cross‐section of unlevered equity returns. Compared with levered (stock) returns, unlevered market beta plays a more important role in explaining the cross‐section of unlevered equity returns, even after controlling for size and BTM. The size effect is weakened, while the value premium and the volatility puzzle virtually disappear for unlevered returns. We show that leverage induces heteroskedasticity in returns. Unlevering returns removes this pattern, which is otherwise difficult to address by controlling for leverage in regressions.


9
Household Debt Overhang and Unemployment

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Jason Roderick Donaldson (Washington University in St. Louis and CEPR)

Giorgia Piacentino (Columbia and CEPR)

Anjan Thakor (Washington University in St. Louis and ECGI)


Abstract

We use a labor‐search model to explain why the worst employment slumps often follow expansions of household debt. We find that households protected by limited liability suffer from a household‐debt‐overhang problem that leads them to require high wages to work. Firms respond by posting high wages but few vacancies. This vacancy posting effect implies that high household debt leads to high unemployment. Even though households borrow from banks via bilaterally optimal contracts, the equilibrium level of household debt is inefficiently high due to a household‐debt externality. We analyze the role that a financial regulator can play in mitigating this externality.


10
Financial Markets, the Real Economy, and Self‐Fulfilling Uncertainties

原刊和作者:

Journal of Finance 20196

Jess Benhabib (New York University)

Xuewen Liu (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

Pengfei Wang (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)


Abstract

We develop a model of informational interdependence between financial markets and the real economy, linking economic uncertainty to information production and aggregate economic activities in general equilibrium. The mutual learning between financial markets and the real economy creates a strategic complementarity in their information production, leading to self‐fulfilling surges in economic uncertainties. In a dynamic setting, our model characterizes self‐fulfilling uncertainty traps with two steady‐state equilibria and a two‐stage economic crisis in transitional dynamics.


原文:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15406261/2019/74/3


【长按二维码自动识别】查看摘要或原文 



本“顶级期刊目录”系列搜索方法:关注后“进入公众号”,主页下方“期刊目录”—“JF”。



关于我们

微信公众号“金融学前沿论文速递”精选推送国内外金融学顶级期刊最新论文。欢迎转载。本号由上海财经大学讲席教授徐龙炳、陆蓉带领的“上财金融创新团队”负责。联系方式:[email protected]

历史推送查询:点击标题下面蓝字“金融学前沿论文速递”,点“查看历史消息”。

分类检索文献:点击标题下面蓝字“金融学前沿论文速递”,关注,进入公众号,页面下方按“系列”、“领域”或“期刊目录”分类检索。

“系列”包括:国际顶级前沿、国内顶级前沿、ESI高被引系列、趣文推荐系列、专题系列、平台及团队介绍、上财金融风采系列。

“领域”包括:资产定价、公司金融、行为金融、投资者行为、金融市场、金融中介、金融工具及其他。

“期刊目录”包括:JF、JFE、RFS、JFQA、《经济研究》、《管理世界》、《金融研究》、《财经研究》。

金融学前沿论文速递