Skocpol, Theda, “Sociology's Historical Imagination,” in Theda Skocpol, ed.,
Vision and Method
in Historical Sociology
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements
and Agendas,” in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds.,
Comparative Historical
Analysis in the Social Sciences
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Adams, Julia, Elisabeth S. Clemens, and Ann Shola Orloff, eds., “Introduction: Social Theory,
Modernity, and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology,” in Julia Adams, Elisabeth S.
Clemens, and Ann Shola Orloff,
Remaking Modernity: Politics and Processes in Historical
Sociology
(Durham: Duke University Press, 2005).
2. Examplar 1: Skocpol on Social Revolution
Skocpol, Theda,
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and
China
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), introduction and part 1.
这本书我们不仅介绍过好几次，关于后续比较历史分析中的“事件-文化学派”对
Skocpol
的批评，以及Skocopl对其的回击我们也介绍了。参见：
批评 | 斯考切波（1985）回击Sewell：国家权力的革命性重建主导的文化习语和政治意识形态
评论 | Sewell（1985）批评斯考切波：意识形态转型与法国大革命
Mahoney, James, “Nominal, Ordinal, Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis,”
American
Journal of Sociology
104 (January 1999), pp. 1154-1196 (esp. pp. 1154-1169).
3
. Culture, Structure, Agency
Sewell, William H., Jr., “Ideologies and Social Revolutions: Reflections on the French Case,”
Journal of Modern History
57:1 (1985), pp. 57-85.
Skocpol, Theda, “Cultural Idioms and Political Ideologies in the Revolutionary Reconstruction of
State Power: A Rejoinder to Sewell,”
Journal of Modern History
57:1 (1985), pp. 86-96.
（就是上面2中那两篇）
Sewell, William H., Jr., “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,”
American Journal of Sociology
98 (1992), pp. 1-29.
在本中，Sewell调整了吉登斯的结构定义，将其推向了能动性和转型维度。孙宇凡有文探讨，参见：
结构、转型与事件时间性:休厄尔《历史的诸逻辑:社会理论与社会转型》的内在批判
Hays, Sharon, “Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture,”
Sociological Theory
12:1 (March 1994), pp. 57-72.
4. Exemplar #2: Marx on Race and Nation
Marx, Anthony W.,
Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of South Africa, the United States,
and Brazil
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,”
American
Political Science Review
94 (2000), pp. 251-67.
James Mahoney, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,”
Theory and Society
29:4 (August
2000), pp. 507-548.
James Mahoney的Path dependence观点很鲜明，一篇文章被李钧鹏老师翻译成中文，参见：
詹姆斯•马奥尼(James Mahoney）| 路径依赖、制度理论与比较历史分析
我们曾组织圆桌论坛，详细探讨过这两篇文章：
话说路径依赖 （上）| 理论志学术圆桌讨论第一期
话说路径依赖 （下）| 理论志学术圆桌讨论第一期
Pierson, Paul. “Big, Slow-Moving, and . . . Invisible: Macrosocial Processes in the Study of
Comparative Politics,” 177-207 in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds.,
Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences
(Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2003).
Thelen, Kathleen, “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis,”
208-40 in James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds.,
Comparative Historical
Analysis in the Social Sciences
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
路径依赖论文又可参见：
钱力成 | 历史社会学中的路径依赖：两种视角的分析
6. Exemplar #3: Collier on Labor, Elites, and Democracy
Collier, Ruth Berins,
Paths Toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europeand South America
(New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
7. Using and Citing Sources
Goldthorpe, John, "The Uses of History in Sociology: Reflections on Some Recent Tendencies,"
British Journal of Sociology
42 (1991), pp. 211-230.
Lustick, Ian, “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the
Problem of Selection Bias,”
American Political Science Review
90 (1996), pp. 605-618.
Milligan, John D., "The Treatment of an Historical Source,"
History and Theor
y
18: 2 (1979), pp.
177-196.
Mariampolski, Hyman, and Dana C. Hughes, "The Use of Personal Documents in Historical
Sociology,"
The American Sociologist
13 (May 1978), pp. 104-113.
Mahoney, James and Celso M. Villegas, “Historical Enquiry and Comparative Politics,” in Carles
Boix and Susan C. Stokes, eds.,
Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics
(Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2007).
8. State Development in England
Anderson, Perry,
Lineages of the Absolutist State
(London: Verso, 1974), Foreword, Chapters 1-2
and Chapter 5.
Downing, Brian M.,
The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and
Autocracy in Early Modern Europe
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992), Chapters
1-3 and Chapter 7.
Ertman, Thomas,
The Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early
Modern Europe
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), chaps. 1 and 4.
以上三本书是比较政治学必读书物。都被翻译成了中文：
这么文献我们介绍过许多回。最有趣的还是埃特曼的模型：
9. Exemplar #4: Schneider on Business Politics in Latin A
merica
Schneider, Ben R
oss,
Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
