【K宝学堂之翻译练习】长难句解析

这里是名人名言可以积累着用到作文里哦~~加分项哦~~同时，我们可以在这里展开思维，摸索意译的感觉。

We have learned that power is a positive force if it is used for positive purpose.

——Elizabeth Dole

力量本身并不不带色彩，善恶来源于力量的方向。

@本栏目由小太阳Kiki赞助

这里是昨天的句子吼~~~

Yet among Mr Reeves’s most striking findings about relative intergenerational mobility is that it seems not to change over time. It is not the case, in other words, that the children of the poor once had a good shot at joining the ranks of the rich, but no longer do.

这里是K宝做的解析哈~~~昨天不懂的可以来这里看哈~

1. 首句作状语的介词短语放于句首引起的倒装句，这里是由among引导

2. 首句这里依旧用The subject of the main clause:that  subordinate clause

   Verb：be

3. 次句，主语从句，很拗口的一个，但意思同上句

这是K宝的翻译吼~~~如果有不同意见的，给K宝留言，我看到了会回复的~~~

Yet among Mr Reeves’s most striking findings about relative intergenerational mobility is that it seems not to change over time. It is not the case, in other words, that the children of the poor once had a good shot at joining the ranks of the rich, but no longer do.

但在Mr Reeves的研究成果当中最引人注目的是代际的贫富相对流动并不随时间变化。用别的话来讲就是，穷人的孩子曾经有过但不再有机会计入富人的阶层，这句话并不是事实。

P.S.这次我看见句号才更新的，良心啊

大家好，背景来补充

昨天的译文上面有一句，the upper middle class: thepatrimonial middle class whose prosperity gives them a crucial stake in political stability.

当中stake应该翻译为“基柱”，或者利害关系，或者更直接的： important part or share in sth.

这里K宝会每天更新些有用的东西，主要涉及1.翻译的原则（会有练习的句子，如果么太多人参与的话，就不弄句子啦~~~）2.高级单词的替换（为作文做好准备）3.一些基本的作文用句（俗称是作文模板？！在加上自己的积累应该会形成自己的写作模板吧~~~所以不能称作作文模板吼！）4.一些app的测评&推荐（比如那个拖了很久的背单词app）5.一些资源的利用还有各种方法论吧（各种杂七杂八的东西，总之是有用的！）以上内容每天至少涉及一项吼~~~

来，我们一起飞啊～

阅读真题

But the Nobel Foundation’s limit of three recipients per prize,each of whom must still be living,has long been outgrown by the collaborative nature of modern research—as will be demonstrated by the inevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discovery of the Higgs boson.

结构简析：

这句的成分冗长，本质上并不难解，阅读的时候看见了破折号，删掉后面的补充成分，这句话就剩下一半了……就算成分冗长，调换一下语序也是上佳的方法。

昨天发现了一个亲给我写的邮件，99年的陈年老句，长得突破天际，很好，不过太久的题了，不适合给亲上墙哈

Cream试译：

But the Nobel Foundation’s limit of three recipients per prize,each of whom must still be living,has long been outgrown by the collaborative nature of modern research—as will be demonstrated by the inevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discovery of the Higgs boson.

但诺贝尔奖基金会关于单个奖项三人并且需要在世的限制早已落后于现代研究的协同化本质，在承认Higgs boson的发现时，无可避免地，人们总会争论有谁被诺奖忽略了，诺奖这个限制也会受到抗议.