专栏名称: 金融经济学
传播金融学前沿研究动态
目录
相关文章推荐
青年文摘  ·  你是黑夜里最亮的星 ·  昨天  
冯唐  ·  让领导知道你干了很多活的秘诀 ·  4 天前  
每日读报60秒  ·  今日早安心语日签 ·  3 天前  
冯唐  ·  拥抱2025新年,从一条羊绒围巾开始 ·  5 天前  
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  金融经济学

Empirical Methods in Corporate Finance

金融经济学  · 公众号  ·  · 2019-05-05 21:30

正文

03期

编辑:李子健  审核:陆堇

Empirical Methods in Corporate Finance: 

Event Studies(3)

  • Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds

  • Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns

  • Uniformly Least Powerful Tests of Market Efficiency


1.Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds

Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1): 3-56


Eugene F. Fama  , University of Chicago

Kenneth R. French , University of Chicago


Abstract

This paper identities five common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. There are three stock-market factors: an overall market factor and factors related to firm size and book-to-market equity. There are two bond-market factors. related to maturity and default risks. Stock returns have shared variation due to the stock-market factors, and they are linked to bond returns through shared variation in the bond-market factors. Except for low-grade corporates. the bond-market factors capture the common variation in bond returns. Most important. the five factors seem to explain average returns on stocks and bonds.


原文链接:

https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5



2.Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns

The Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(1): 165-201


John D. Lyon ,University of California, Davis

Brad M. Barber ,University of California, Davis

Chih-Ling Tsai ,University of California, Davis


Abstract

We analyze tests for long-run abnormal returns and document that two approaches yield well-specified test statistics in random samples. The first uses a traditional event study framework and buy-and-hold abnormal returns calculated using carefully constructed reference portfolios. Inference is based on either a skewnessadjusted t-statistic or the empirically generated distribution of long-run abnormal returns. The second approach is based on calculation of mean monthly abnormal returns using calendar-time portfolios and a time-series t-statistic. Though both approaches perform well in random samples, misspecification in nonrandom samples is pervasive. Thus, analysis of long-run abnormal returns is treacherous.


原文链接:

https://sci-hub.tw/10.2307/222413



3.Uniformly Least Powerful Tests of Market Efficiency

Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 55: 329-359


Tim Loughran , University of Notre Dame

Jay R. Ritter , University of Florida


Abstract

Defenders of market efficiency argue that anomalies involving long-term abnormal returns are not robust to alternative methodologies. We argue that because various methodologies use different weighting schemes, the magnitude of abnormal returns should differ, and in a predictable manner. Three problems are identified that cause low power in value-weighted three-factor time series regressions when abnormal returns following managerial actions are being estimated. We illustrate the sensitivities in the context of the new issues puzzle as well as with simulations. More generally, multifactor models as currently used do not, and cannot, test market efficiency.


原文链接:

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c718/44896fa8b03584669daf5ebf1e0385e4748a.pdf

END


◆ 文章仅做学术交流之用,原文版权归原作者及原发刊单位所有,欢迎转载

◆ 点击“阅读原文”即可进入下载(提取码:p1jt)

◆ 联系方式:[email protected],发送值得一读的文章我们为您分享

◆ 欢迎关注:搜索公众号Finance-paper或识别图中二维码