Empirical Methods in Corporate Finance:
Event Studies(3)
Common Risk Factors in the Returns on
Stocks and Bonds
Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run
Abnormal Stock Returns
Uniformly Least Powerful Tests of Market Efficiency
1.Common Risk Factors in the Returns on
Stocks and Bonds
Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1): 3-56
Eugene F. Fama , University of Chicago
Kenneth R. French , University of Chicago
This paper identities five common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. There are three
stock-market factors: an overall market factor and factors related to firm size and book-to-market
equity. There are two bond-market factors. related to maturity and default risks. Stock returns have
shared variation due to the stock-market factors, and they are linked to bond returns through
shared variation in the bond-market factors. Except for low-grade corporates. the bond-market
factors capture the common variation in bond returns. Most important. the five factors seem to
explain average returns on stocks and bonds.
原文链接:
https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5
2.Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run
Abnormal Stock Returns
The Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(1): 165-201
John D. Lyon ,University of California, Davis
Brad M. Barber ,University of California, Davis
Chih-Ling Tsai ,University of California, Davis
We analyze tests for long-run abnormal returns and document that two approaches
yield well-specified test statistics in random samples. The first uses a traditional
event study framework and buy-and-hold abnormal returns calculated using carefully
constructed reference portfolios. Inference is based on either a skewnessadjusted
t-statistic or the empirically generated distribution of long-run abnormal
returns. The second approach is based on calculation of mean monthly abnormal
returns using calendar-time portfolios and a time-series t-statistic. Though both
approaches perform well in random samples, misspecification in nonrandom samples
is pervasive. Thus, analysis of long-run abnormal returns is treacherous.
原文链接:
https://sci-hub.tw/10.2307/222413
3.Uniformly Least Powerful Tests of Market Efficiency
Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 55: 329-359
Tim Loughran , University of Notre Dame
Jay R. Ritter , University of Florida
Defenders of market efficiency argue that anomalies involving long-term abnormal returns are
not robust to alternative methodologies. We argue that because various methodologies use
different weighting schemes, the magnitude of abnormal returns should differ, and in a
predictable manner. Three problems are identified that cause low power in value-weighted
three-factor time series regressions when abnormal returns following managerial actions are
being estimated. We illustrate the sensitivities in the context of the new issues puzzle as well as
with simulations. More generally, multifactor models as currently used do not, and cannot, test
market efficiency.
原文链接:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c718/44896fa8b03584669daf5ebf1e0385e4748a.pdf
◆ 文章仅做学术交流之用,原文版权归原作者及原发刊单位所有,欢迎转载
◆ 点击“阅读原文”即可进入下载(提取码:p1jt)
◆ 联系方式:[email protected],发送值得一读的文章我们为您分享
◆ 欢迎关注:搜索公众号Finance-paper或识别图中二维码