This study investigates the effects of tightening auditing standards on corporate welfare, audit firms' welfare, and social welfare. The audit quality of an audit firm has a dual role: (a) the precision effect, in which the audit quality affects the credibility of the accounting reports; (b) the signaling effect, in which a company's choice of a high-quality versus a low-quality audit firm signals its hidden information about its economic prospects. In addition, the audit firms engage in a two-stage competition: in an earlier stage, they compete in audit quality; in a later stage, they compete in audit fee.
We make the following contributions to the literature. (1) We show how a social planner sets the optimal auditing standard. (2) We employ a general equilibrium framework which incorporates an oligopolistic audit market and a competitive capital market. In addition, we identify different commitment devices in an unregulated economy and a regulated economy that cause diametrically opposite equilibrium results and welfare effects. (3) We make a set of empirical predictions on both the supply of audits and the demand for audits.