专栏名称: TFT小组

XDF土鳖，CMU码农，分享口语学习经验，分享北美留学感受。

写作真题｜No.6 城市快速发展是好事吗？

TFT小组 · 公众号 · 留学 · 2020-02-26 10:30

正文

政策/环境类 题目在托福写作中会经常遇到，只要积累了两三个主题的语料，这一类题目的论述就能游刃有余。今天先从 「写作虐练」 任务中的真题入手，来看看小伙伴们是如何解决这类问题的。

2020年1月【写作虐炼】Day13 Task：

真题演练 （2019年10月27日）

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The rapid growth of cities has a positive impact on the development of the society.

城市建设与社会发展之间的关系，相信对于大多数同学，尤其是学理工科类的同学，离开高中后很少思考该类型的问题。利用托福备考的时间开启自己的“上帝视角”，储备好一定的语料，就能写好政策/环境类的题目。

Coach讲解

城市的快速发展对社会发展具有积极影响。你是否同意这一观点？

这是一道 二选一 类型的题目。政策类的题目可以从两个角度思考：

一是 原因方 ：城市的快速建设可能会带动经济收入和人口流动，但也会带来环境、贫富差距问题；
二是 需求方 ：社会的良性发展需要经济支持，同时也需要避免环境污染、收入悬殊带来的民生问题。

如果赞同这一观点，可以认同城市建设激活更多产业发展，为社会发展吸引更多外来资金。 The rapid growth of cities promotes industrial revolution and accumulates external funding to support the development of society. 同时吸引人才建设社会，More people are likely to join the growth of cities as high-tech experts or other kinds of workforce.

如果反对此观点，从环境和急功近利的角度展开。 (1)The rapid growth of cities means to consume more fuel and resources to build up the infrastructure, resulting in more deforestation and air pollution. (2)Government may misjudge the economic climate and raise too much cash for development, wasting taxation and inciting conflicts.

思路示范

思路1

Opinion: The rapid growth of cities is beneficial.

Outline:

Reason: Urbanization can bring sustainable development. It can lead to higher productivity and development of green economy.

L1. Higher productivity. Ex. Report.

L2. Thriving service sector less pollution.

思路2

Opinion: The city rapid growth can bring some problems.

Outline:

Reason: City congestion: Increasing population traffic jams and lack of house

L1. High population density increasing motor vehicles inefficient traffic flow

L2. Increasing population, no adequate housing and high housing cost

真题演练打卡

来学习一下 「写作虐炼」 学员的回答吧：

@学员吕*

真题演练&Coach点评：

更多Coach点评上下滑动查看

举一反三

政策/环境类题目在平时的思维练习中可能较少遇到，在真题中也不止以“发展问题”的形式出现，再来看看下面这题，相信你会有更深的体会。

(2019年9月22日)

Some companies provide important products or service, but also damage the environment. Some people believe that the government should impose more penalty, higher tax and larger fine on these companies, while others believe there are better ways. Which do you prefer?

同样是 二选一 类题目，首句交代了生产企业的背景，提供重要的产品或服务的同时可能损坏环境。其中一个选项规定了政府出台更严厉的惩罚制度，另一个选项则比较开放，可由考生自拟内容。无论是哪一个选项都能比较好地切入。

如果认同强硬的治理政策，可以从多个分析角度设计行文结构，以下列举一种：比如，高额罚金和刑罚对所有公司都具有震慑力，能够督促他们规范行为；强硬的政策也能提高政府的管理效率，直击根本问题。

如果想要提出自己的观点，首先要反驳选项一的不利之处。 Strict regulations from government could deter some poor-managed companies and so have a negative on industrial development. 然后展开自己的better ways : Rather than enforcing stricter penalty and fine, government can figure out more methods like offering subsidy for renovation to reduce their emission.

思路示范

Opinion: In my opinion, government has the alternative to tackle the environmental problems from these companies.

Outline:

R1: Firstly, Strict regulations from government could deter some poor-managed companies and so have a negative on industrial development.

R2: Secondly, rather than enforcing stricter penalty and fine, government can figure out more methods like offering subsidy for renovation to reduce their emission.

「写作 真题」回顾

No.5 又是假新闻？！你怎么看？

No.4 放假后应不应该在家工作？

No.3 抽象话题也可以很好写？

No.2 太空探索、健康饮食...这些政府话题怎么开脑洞？

No.1 灵魂一问：

写作真题｜No.6 城市快速发展是好事吗？

正文

请到「今天看啥」查看全文