专栏名称: 金融经济学
传播金融学前沿研究动态
目录
相关文章推荐
广东台今日关注  ·  一废弃瓷窑中,发现无名尸体! ·  10 小时前  
广东公共DV现场  ·  没放完的烟花爆竹怎么处理?消防亲测 ·  2 天前  
开平广播电视台  ·  开平这个“银行”让村民乐开了花! ·  2 天前  
开平广播电视台  ·  “醉”新一批!开平这几名“红”脸司机上榜→ ·  2 天前  
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  金融经济学

AFA Ph.D. Student Poster Session at the 2020 Annual Meeting(24)

金融经济学  · 公众号  ·  · 2020-03-30 21:30

正文

24期


编辑:蔡婉秋  审核:丁克达

  • How Have Stock Markets Responded to 35 Years of Analyst Reports? Evidence from Machine Learning and Textual Analysis

  • Mandatory Pollution Abatement, Environmental Awareness, and Firm Investment

  • Why do US Firms use more Long-term Debt Post Activist Interventions?

1、How Have Stock Markets Responded to 35 Years of Analyst Reports? Evidence from Machine Learning and Textual Analysis

Working paper , issued in July 2019.


Abena Owusu, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


Abstract

Using machine learning (ML) and contrasting with simple textual sentiment score and principal components analysis (PCA) methods, we examine the time se- ries of content within over 700,000 sell-side analyst research reports from 1983 to 2017. We find that analyst reports have significantly changed across a variety of dimensions including length and content of four existing and two new dictionaries related to valuation and alternative metrics. We find that the naive net tone of reports only explains contemporaneous, not future, equity returns. On the other hand, we find that ML methods provide substantially different results from naive sentiment and PCA approaches on determining the impact of analyst reports on financial markets. We also examine the ability of reports to predict changes in firm short interest and volatility. Overall, we find that sell-side analyst reports have stronger impact on smaller cap stocks .


原文链接:

https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=AFAPS2020&paper_id=263


2、Mandatory Pollution Abatement, Environmental Awareness, and Firm Investment

Working paper , issued in February 2020.


Tri Vi Dang, Columbia University
Youan Wang, University of Hong Kong
Zigan Wang, University of Hong Kong


Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of mandatory pollution abatement on U.S. corporate investment and performance and shows that environmental regulation can stimulate investment in innovation. The following set of theoretical and empirical results are presented. For financially unconstrained firms, mandatory pollution abatement leads to more current R&D investment, more future investment in pollution abatement, reduces current profits, increases future profits and reduces the market value of the firm. However, if firms are financially constrained three of the five consequences are different. It leads to less current R&D investment, less future investment in pollution abatement and lower future profits.

原文链接:


https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3257675


3、 Why do US Firms use more Long-term Debt Post Activist Interventions?

Working paper , issued in June 2019.


Amanjot Singh,







请到「今天看啥」查看全文