1. Facilitating Arbitration Evidence Gathering with Court-Issued Investigation Orders
1. 法院开具调查令便利仲裁取证
In the past, due to the independence of arbitral tribunals, when an arbitral tribunal needed to investigate and gather evidence, it could only issue letters of assistance to collect evidence, which lacked judicial enforcement power.
受限于仲裁庭独立性的特点,以往需要由仲裁庭调查取证时,仲裁庭往往仅能通过开具协助调查函用以搜集证据,但该等协助调查函并无司法强制力。
On November 7, 2023, the Xiamen International Commercial Court issued the first investigation order for an arbitration case in China based on the application of the Xiamen Arbitration Commission. Subsequently, the Xiamen Intermediate People's Court formulated the Interim Provisions on Assisting Arbitration Institutions in Issuing Investigation Orders. In Article 22 of the Regulations in Shanghai dated November 22, 2023, provisions are made for the court's assistance to arbitration institutions in investigating and gathering evidence as well. Based on this, on December 1, 2023, Minhang District People's Court in Shanghai assisted the Shanghai Arbitration Commission in issuing investigation orders, successfully helping parties and the arbitral tribunal collect relevant evidence.
2023年11月7日,厦门国际商事法庭根据厦门仲裁委员会的申请发出了全国首份仲裁案件调查令,厦门市中级人民法院也随即制订了《关于仲裁机构申请开具调查令的暂行规定》。在前文上海市2023年11月22日发布的《条例》第22条中,对于法院协助仲裁机构调查取证亦有规定。据此,2023年12月1日上海市闵行区人民法院协助上海仲裁委员会开具调查令,并成功帮助当事人和仲裁庭收集了相关证据。
2. First Confirmation of the Status of "Soft Law" in Judicial Review of International Arbitration
2. 首次确认国际仲裁中“软法”在司法审查中的地位
On June 29, 2023, the Fourth Intermediate People's Court of Beijing issued a civil ruling recognizing the validity of an arbitration clause stating "ICC Arbitration Court in Beijing". It further confirmed that decisions made based on "foreign arbitration institutions conducting arbitration in Mainland of China" fall under the jurisdiction of Chinese law regarding foreign-related arbitration awards. This ruling represents the first time in judicial practice that the status of "soft law" in the field of international commercial arbitration, referring to rules established by some international organizations and arbitration institutions to fill procedural legal gaps in international commercial arbitration (such as the IBA Rules on Taking Evidence in International Arbitration and IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, etc.), has been acknowledged in the judicial review process. It has certain guiding significance in the judicial review process of arbitration.
2023年6月29日,北京市第四中级人民法院作出民事裁定书,认可了“ICC仲裁院在北京仲裁”的仲裁条款效力,并再次确认了根据“外国仲裁机构在中国内地仲裁”作出的裁决属于中国法下的涉外仲裁裁决。同时该裁定也是司法实践中首次确认国际商事仲裁领域的“软法”(实践中通过当事人的约定或仲裁庭的选择予以适用的由一些国际组织和仲裁机构针对国际商事仲裁中的程序法律空白所制定的规则,如《IBA国际商事仲裁取证规则》《IBA国际仲裁利益冲突指引》等)在仲裁司法审查过程中具有一定指导意义。
3. Clarifying Review Standards to Support Healthy Development of Arbitration
3. 明晰审查标准,支持仲裁健康发展
In June 2023, the Supreme People's Court compiled and published the Understanding and Application of the Minutes of the Symposium on Foreign-Related Commercial and Maritime Trial Work of National Courts, providing detailed explanations on the standards and application of judicial reviews for the effectiveness of arbitration agreements, setting aside arbitration awards, and recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards. On July 25, 2023, the Fourth Intermediate People's Court of Beijing reported ten typical cases covering the establishment, effectiveness, and judicial review of arbitration agreements and arbitral awards. On September 27, 2023, the Supreme People's Court released the fourth batch of typical cases related to the construction of the One Belt One Road, providing valuable reference experience for courts in recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards and mutually enforcing arbitral awards between Mainland of China and Hong Kong. On October 25, 2023, the Beijing Financial Court published ten typical cases of judicial review of financial arbitration, further clarifying the status and standards of financial arbitration in court review and establishing a clearer legal framework for financial arbitration.
2023年6月,最高人民法院民四庭编著并出版了《〈全国法院涉外商事海事审判工作座谈会会议纪要〉理解与适用》,其中对仲裁协议效力、撤销仲裁裁决、承认与执行仲裁裁决的司法审查标准及其适用进行了详解,为涉外商事仲裁案件的司法审查提供了指导;北京市第四中级人民法院于2023年7月25日通报了十大典型案例,案例涵盖了仲裁协议的成立、生效以及司法审查的认定标准;最高人民法院于2023年9月27日发布了第四批涉“一带一路”建设典型案例,为法院在承认与执行外国仲裁裁决及内地与香港互相执行仲裁裁决方面提供了宝贵的参考经验;北京金融法院于2023年10月25日发布了十起涉金融仲裁司法审查典型案例,进一步明确了金融领域仲裁在法院审查中的地位与标准,为金融仲裁制定了更为清晰的法律框架。