人工智能势如破竹般的发展一次又一次地击破了我们对机器极限的预设。与此同时，全民基本收入政策一步步从极左路线过渡成了主流政客鼓吹的纲领。全民基本收入，即由政府每周或每月给所有国民发放一笔固定津贴，以保障他们的生活。它是英国绿党的政策，也被越来越多的苏格兰国民党和工党议员所接纳。芬兰政府已经在2000名国民中试用了全民基本收入，本周公布的结果显示了非常积极的效果。过去两年，2000位随机选中的芬兰人每月可无条件收到560欧元的收入。他们表示生活得到了很大的改善，压力减轻了，更有动力去找工作（Note:因为560欧是无条件的，所以不用担心有工作后就不能享受失业津贴），也有更多时间去落实商业想法。今年3月，加拿大的安大略省也开始了一个类似的试行计划。
今天的句子：
The conversation, in light of UBI, could go even further: it’s possible for the welfare state not just to act as a safety net, but as a tool for all of us to do less work and spend more time with our loved ones, pursuing personal interests or engaging in our communities.
词汇突破：
1.UBI Universal Basic Income全民基本收入
2.Welfare 福利
3.Safety net 安全保障
4.Pursue 追求
5.Engage 参与
确定主干：
1.The conversation could go even further.
2.it’s possible for the welfare state not just to act as a safety net but as a tool…
切分成分：
1.In light of UBI插入语
2.for all of us to do less work and spend more time with our loved ones状语
3.pursuing personal interests or engaging in our communities现在分词做伴随状语
参考译文：关于全民基本收入的对话还可以走得更远：福利国家制度不仅可以成为安全保障，更能帮助我们做更少工作，有更多时间和亲人相处、追求个人兴趣或者参与社区活动；这是可能的。
昨天的题目:
答案选A
Wilson and colleagues hope to prove their test, which will be more widely available this summer for about $2,400, can be an efficient and reliable solution for the sorts of medical mysteries that befuddle doctors, aggravate patients and can run up huge medical bills.
Which of the following is true according to the text?
A) The cost of test will possibly be a reason for the wide availability of it.
由于：
which will be more widely available this summer for about $2,400
所以Possiblly 就保证了这个选项的正确性
B) The medical mysteries will confuse the patients and increase the bills.
偷换：原文中：befuddled the doctors 选项中是：confuse the patients
虽然befuddle= confuse ,但是宾语被偷换了。
C) The test is created to provide efficient solution for befuddled patients.
偷换：原文中是befuddle doctors而不是befuddled patients
D) The aggravated patients are befuddled by the doctors.
拼凑
实话告诉大家，作为出题人手中的武器并不多，我无非只能做偷换和拼凑，只要你读懂了句子就很容易识别我的干扰项。继续加油吧！
点看复习昨天的句子吧：
出题不易望大家珍惜！加了投票，一起来吧！
明天的句子：
While its rigid laws and zealous unions make labor reforms difficult, Europe nonetheless far outspends the US on labor market programs, puts more emphasis on apprenticeships and vocational training, and generally places higher value on helping displaced workers.
