专栏名称: 唧唧堂
唧唧堂学术管理分享平台,更好的学术阅读与写作!
目录
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  唧唧堂

唧唧堂:JM 营销学研究2021年3月论文摘要7篇

唧唧堂  · 公众号  ·  · 2021-03-15 23:59

正文

picture from Internet
解析作者 | 唧唧堂管理学写作小组: 林迪芬
审校 | 唧唧堂管理学写作小组: Eric.J, 明月奴
编辑 | 悠悠



1、人工智能指导销售代理人:注意事项和解决方案


很多公司都在利用人工智能(AI)教练为销售代理提供培训,并提高他们的工作技能。作者在一系列随机田野实验的基础上提出了与此类实践相关的几个注意事项。实验1表明,人工智能教练相对于人类管理者的增量收益在不同代理人之间呈倒U形分布:虽然排名中间的代理人提高其绩效的幅度最大,但排名最低和排名最高的代理人均表现出有限的增量收益。这种模式是由一种基于学习的机制驱动的,在这种机制中,排名最低的代理人在人工智能和人类教练之间遇到了最严重的信息超载问题,而排名最高的代理人对人工智能的厌恶程度比人类教练更强。为了缓解排名最低的代理人所面临的挑战,实验2通过限制训练反馈水平,重新设计了人工智能教练,这使代理人的表现有了显著的提高。实验3表明,人工智能与人类教练组合的效果优于单独的人工智能或人类教练。这种组合可以利用人工智能教练的硬数据技能和人类管理者的软人际关系技能,解决底层和高层代理员所面临的问题。这些发现为研究者和管理者提供了关于人工智能教练的新见解。


Firms are exploiting artificial intelligence (AI) coaches to provide training to sales agents and improve their job skills. The authors present several caveats associated with such practices based on a series of randomized field experiments. Experiment 1 shows that the incremental benefit of the AI coach over human managers is heterogeneous across agents in an inverted-U shape: whereas middle-ranked agents improve their performance by the largest amount, both bottom- and top-ranked agents show limited incremental gains. This pattern is driven by a learning-based mechanism in which bottom-ranked agents encounter the most severe information overload problem with the AI versus human coach, while top-ranked agents hold the strongest aversion to the AI relative to a human coach. To alleviate the challenge faced by bottom-ranked agents, Experiment 2 redesigns the AI coach by restricting the training feedback level and shows a significant improvement in agent performance. Experiment 3 reveals that the AI–human coach assemblage outperforms either the AI or human coach alone. This assemblage can harness the hard data skills of the AI coach and soft interpersonal skills of human managers, solving both problems faced by bottom- and top-ranked agents. These findings offer novel insights into AI coaches for researchers and managers alike.


参考文献:Luo X, Qin MS, Fang Z, Qu Z. Artificial Intelligence Coaches for Sales Agents: Caveats and Solutions. Journal of Marketing. 2021;85(2):14-32. doi:10.1177/0022242920956676



2、关爱公共池塘资源:利用心理所有权强化公共物品管理行为


如何才能鼓励消费者更好地使用公共物品?通过四项研究,包括两项实地实验和三项记录实际行为的研究,作者证明了增加消费者的个人心理所有权有助于对公共物品的管理。这种效应的产生是因为所有权感增加了消费者的责任感,进而导致积极的关心行为。来自不同情境的证据,包括一个有皮艇运动员的公共湖泊,一个有滑雪者的州立公园,以及一条公共步道。这些证据表明,增加心理归属感,既能提高人们的管理能力,比如从湖边捡垃圾,也能提高财务管理能力,比如捐款。本研究进一步证明,当有线索(如出勤标志)存在时,心理所有权和由此产生的管家行为之间的关系就会减弱,因为这些线索分散了许多人的责任。本研究为消费者、从业人员和政策制定者提供了启示,即通过简单的干预措施可以鼓励消费者更好地管理公共物品。


How can consumers be encouraged to take better care of public goods? Across four studies, including two experiments in the field and three documenting actual behaviors, the authors demonstrate that increasing consumers’ individual psychological ownership facilitates stewardship of public goods. This effect occurs because feelings of ownership increase consumers’perceived responsibility, which then leads to active behavior to care for the good. Evidence from a variety of contexts, including a public lake with kayakers, a state park with skiers, and a public walking path, suggests that increasing psychological ownership enhances both effortful stewardship, such as picking up trash from a lake, and financial stewardship, such as donating money. This work further demonstrates that the relationship between psychological ownership and resulting stewardship behavior is attenuated when there are cues, such as an attendance sign, which diffuse responsibility among many people. This work offers implications for consumers, practitioners, and policy makers with simple interventions that can encourage consumers to be better stewards of public goods.


参考文献:Peck J, Kirk CP, Luangrath AW, Shu SB. Caring for the Commons: Using Psychological Ownership to Enhance Stewardship Behavior for Public Goods. Journal of Marketing. 2021;85(2):33-49. doi:10.1177/0022242920952084


picture from Internet


3、共享经济下平台保护保险对买卖双方的影响:一个自然实验


共享经济已经从根本上改变了营销思想和实践,目前尚未有研究平台级买家保护保险(PPI)是否以及如何影响这种经济中的买家和卖家。作者利用了一个自然实验,即在PPI启动过程中出现了一个意想不到的系统故障,并利用一个食物共享平台上的超过540万个数据点来估计双重差分模型。结果表明,PPI显著增加了买家支出和卖家收入,证实了这种平台级保险在共享经济中的好处。作者还揭示了使这些好处成为可能的买方和卖方的多层反应。PPI通过增加产品订单和追求品种的行为来增加买家的支出。此外,它通过增加客户留存率和获取率来提高销售收入。本文的研究成果主要体现在:(1)对PPI这一降低消费者风险、提高共享平台有效性的平台治理政策的关注;(2)解释PPI如何改变平台上的买卖双方行为;(3)解决哪种类型的买家和卖家从PPI中或多或少受益;(4)在共享经济背景下,指导管理者提高平台声誉、市场效率和消费者福利。


The sharing economy has radically reshaped marketing thought and practice, and research has yet to examine whether and how platform-level buyer protection insurance (PPI) affects buyers and sellers in this economy. The authors exploit a natural experiment involving an unexpected system glitch during a PPI launch and estimate difference-in-differences models using over 5.4 million data points from a food sharing platform. Results suggest that PPI significantly increases buyer spending and seller revenue, affirming the benefits of this platform-level insurance in the sharing economy. The authors also uncover multifaceted buyer-side and seller-side responses that enable such benefits. PPI increases buyer spending by boosting product orders and variety-seeking behavior. Furthermore, it enhances seller revenue by increasing customer retention and acquisition. This work contributes to the literature by (1) putting a spotlight on the topic of PPI, a platform governance policy that reduces consumer risks and improves the efficacy of sharing platforms; (2) accounting for how PPI alters buyer and seller behaviors on a platform; (3) addressing what types of buyers and sellers benefit more or less from PPI; and (4) offering guidance for managers to improve platform reputation, marketplace efficiency, and consumer welfare in the context of the sharing economy.


参考文献:Luo X, Tong S, Lin Z, Zhang C. The Impact of Platform Protection Insurance on Buyers and Sellers in the Sharing Economy: A Natural Experiment. Journal of Marketing. 2021;85(2):50-69. doi:10.1177/0022242920962510



4、剧透者真的会剧透吗?使用主题模型来测量剧透评论对票房收入的影响


相当一部分的在线电影评论中包含剧透,剧透是指提前解决情节不确定性的信息。本文利用票房收入和在美国上映的电影的网上口碑数据,研究了剧透评论的影响后果。为了捕获剧透文本中减少情节不确定性的信息程度,作者提出了剧透强度测量方法,并使用相关主题模型对其进行度量。本文采用电影固定效应和工具变量的动态面板模型,发现剧透强度与票房收入之间存在显著正相关关系,其弹性系数为0.06。对于上映时间有限、广告支出较小、用户评分适中的电影,剧透强度的积极影响更大,且在电影上映后的早期阶段更强。通过事件研究和在线实验,作者进一步证明了剧透评论可以帮助消费者减少他们对电影质量的不确定性,从而鼓励消费者去电影院看电影。因此,电影公司可以从消费者获得情节密集的评论中获益,并应积极监控剧透评论的内容,以更好地预测票房表现。


A sizable portion of online movie reviews contain spoilers, defined as information that prematurely resolves plot uncertainty. In this research, the authors study the consequences of spoiler reviews using data on box office revenue and online word of mouth for movies released in the United States. To capture the degree of information in spoiler review text that reduces plot uncertainty, the authors propose a spoiler intensity metric and measure it using a correlated topic model. Using a dynamic panel model with movie fixed effects and instrumental variables, the authors find a significant and positive relationship between spoiler intensity and box office revenue with an elasticity of .06. The positive effect of spoiler intensity is greater for movies with a limited release, smaller advertising spending, and moderate user ratings, and is stronger in the earlier days after the movie’s release. Using an event study and online experiments, the authors provide further evidence that spoiler reviews can help consumers reduce their uncertainty about the quality of movies, consequently encouraging theater visits. Thus, movie studios may benefit from consumers’ access to plot-intense reviews and should actively monitor the content of spoiler reviews to better forecast box office performance.


参考文献:Ryoo JH (Joseph), Wang X (Shane), Lu S. Do Spoilers Really Spoil? Using Topic Modeling to Measure the Effect of Spoiler Reviews on Box Office Revenue. Journal of Marketing. 2021;85(2):70-88. doi:10.1177/0022242920937703


picture from Internet


5、在价格谈判中销售人员的双重代理


B2B企业应该在何时鼓励他们的销售人员在价格谈判中拥护客户利益?为了解决这一问题,本研究将双重代理理论拓展到销售领域。在研究1中,作者利用美国一家主要经销商的二手数据研究了折扣谈判。他们发现,当销售人员大力支持双方时,顾客和销售者都能体验到最有利的结果;单独支持任何一方都会适得其反。研究2使用匹配调查、定价和利润数据证实了这些结果,并证明了一个关键的边界条件:广泛的顾客-销售者关系通过增强公司监控销售人员的能力,使顾客支持和销售者支持之间产生协同效应。在研究3中,B2B买家的实验复制了关键发现,并为理论机制提供了证据。本研究强调了销售人员的双重角色之间的相互依赖关系,并论证了销售人员如何作为客户和销售人员的有效代理,从而缓解角色冲突所带来的挑战。


When should business-to-business firms encourage their salespeople to advocate for the customer in pricing negotiations? This research extends dual agency theory to the sales domain to address this question. In Study 1, the authors examine discount negotiations with secondary data from a major U.S. distributor. They find that the customer and seller both experience the most favorable outcomes when the salesperson advocates strongly for both parties; advocacy for either party alone is counterproductive. Study 2 confirms these results using matched survey, pricing, and profit data and demonstrates a key boundary condition: broad customer–seller ties enable the synergy between customer advocacy and seller advocacy by enhancing the firms’abilities to monitor the salesperson. In Study 3, experiments with business-to-business buyers replicate key findings and provide evidence for theorized mechanisms. This research emphasizes the interdependence between the salesperson’s dual roles and demonstrates how the salesperson can serve as an effective agent of both the customer and seller, thereby mitigating challenges associated with role conflict.


参考文献:Lawrence JM, Scheer LK, Crecelius AT, Lam SK. Salesperson Dual Agency in Price Negotiations. Journal of Marketing. 2021;85(2):89-109. doi:10.1177/0022242920974611



6、努力实现:在知名岗位上管理专业品牌


作者探讨了个人在“有声望的职位”(知名组织中的知名职位)工作并努力保持职业流动性时管理专业品牌所面临的挑战。采用案例研究方法并借鉴社会学领域的理论,作者确定了两种类型的紧张关系(基于资源和基于身份),这是由声望较高的职位和有利于缓解紧张和保持流动性的四种做法引发的。除了将先前关于个人品牌的理论扩展到包括职业流动性的考虑之外,本研究对更好地理解专业人士和他们为之工作的品牌之间关系的复杂性具有意义。这表明,在拥有显赫职位的同时还要管理其专业品牌的个人,需要在受益于外部利益相关者眼中的从属关系与同时保持职业独立性以保持职业流动性之间取得平衡。


The authors address the challenges individuals face when managing their professional brands while working in “prestigious posts”(high-profile jobs in established organizations) and striving to maintain career mobility. Using a case study approach and drawing on sociological field theories, the authors identify two types of tensions (resource-based and identity-based) that are triggered by prestigious posts and four practices conducive to mitigating tensions and maintaining mobility. Beyond extending prior theory on person brands to include consideration of career mobility, this work has implications for better understanding the complexities of affiliations between professionals and the brands they work for. It suggests that individuals who are managing their professional brands while holding prestigious posts need to strike a balance between benefiting from the affiliation in the eyes of external stakeholders and at the same time maintaining their professional independence to maintain career mobility.


参考文献:Parmentier M-A, Fischer E. Working It: Managing Professional Brands in Prestigious Posts. Journal of Marketing. 2021;85(2):110-128. doi:10.1177/0022242920953818


picture from Internet


7、相当健康的食物:美学如何以及何时增强健康的感觉


营销人员经常把食物打扮得好看(如在广告中)。本文探讨了美学(由古典美学原则定义,如秩序、对称和平衡)对健康判断的影响。作者提出,更漂亮的食物被认为是更健康的,特别是因为古典美学特征使它看起来更天然。在一项试点研究中,六个主要研究和四个补充研究(总样本数为4301)对不健康的和健康的、加工过的和未加工过的、拍照过的和真实的食物进行了研究,人们认为同样的食物更漂亮的版本更健康(例如,营养更多,脂肪更少),尽管价格相同。即使考虑到金钱上的利害关系,人们也会被美貌所误导。按照自然过程,知觉自然性调解了效果;对“自然=健康”联系的信念缓和了这一过程;没有唤起自然性的表现性美学没有产生这种效果(尽管它很漂亮);而人为修正的提醒抑制了感知自然,降低了这种效果。考虑到漂亮的食品造型会误导消费者对不健康食品的健康判断,管理者和政策制定者应该考虑修改免责声明,以此作为减轻“健康”偏见的一种工具。


Marketers frequently style food to look pretty (e.g., in advertising). This article investigates how pretty aesthetics (defined by classical aesthetic principles, such as order, symmetry, and balance) influence healthiness judgments. The author proposes that prettier food is perceived as healthier, specifically because classical aesthetic features make it appear more natural. In a pilot, six main studies and four supplemental studies (total N = 4,301) across unhealthy and healthy, processed and unprocessed, and photographed and real foods alike, people judged prettier versions of the same food as healthier (e.g., more nutrients, less fat), despite equal perceived price. Even given financial stakes, people were misled by prettiness. In line with the proposed naturalness process, perceived naturalness mediated the effect; belief in a “natural = healthy” connection moderated it; expressive aesthetics, which do not evoke naturalness, did not produce the effect (despite being pretty); and reminders of artificial modification, which suppress perceived naturalness, mitigated it. Given that pretty food styling can harm consumers by misleading healthiness judgments for unhealthy foods, managers and policy makers should consider modification disclaimers as a tool to mitigate the “pretty = healthy” bias.







请到「今天看啥」查看全文