专栏名称: 比尔盖茨
比尔·盖茨(Bill Gates)唯一官方公众号,分享他见过的人、读过的书和学到的功课,内容包括全球健康、能源创新、教育改革和读书笔记等。
目录
相关文章推荐
国家林业和草原局  ·  自然资源部2025年生态文明大讲堂第一讲开讲 ·  15 小时前  
国家林业和草原局  ·  自然资源部2025年生态文明大讲堂第一讲开讲 ·  15 小时前  
VOCs前沿  ·  蛇年开工大吉 ·  昨天  
电动中国  ·  太蓝新能源2024年度盘点 ·  4 天前  
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  比尔盖茨

飞机、火车和智能手机 | 盖茨原创

比尔盖茨  · 公众号  · 科技自媒体  · 2024-10-17 15:00

正文


将近三十年前,我写了一本名为《未来之路》的书,探讨了互联网和其他新数字技术的变革潜力。当时,我设想了一个在线支付和电子政务将改变我们与金钱、服务以及彼此互动的世界。如今,这在很大程度上已经成为现实,部分要归功于数字公共基础设施(DPI)的发展。在我最近的全球旅行中,我亲眼看到了DPI如何彻底改变整个国家服务其人民、应对危机和促进经济增长的方式。在盖茨基金会,我们将DPI视为帮助拯救生命和在贫困国家抗击贫困的重要组成部分。


DPI由几个核心组成部分构成:数字身份系统,可以安全地证明你的身份;支付系统,可以快速低成本地转移资金;以及数据交换平台,使不同的服务能够无缝协作。这些系统和平台对于数字世界而言,就如同公路、桥梁和电力线路之于物理世界——它们是连接人、数据和资金的基础结构。强大的DPI可以推动一个国家的发展,使人们更容易获得基本服务,参与正式经济活动,并改善生活质量。反之,实施不当或完全缺失的DPI则会阻碍一个国家的发展,延续低效和不平等的状况。


在21世纪,数字公共基础设施被证明与实体基础设施一样,对推动进步至关重要。并且在全球范围内,凡是采纳的地方都取得了令人瞩目的成效。


点击观看视频

以我今年早些时候访问的印度为例。印度的数字身份系统Aadhaar为每个居民提供了证明身份的能力,而统一支付接口(Unified Payments Interface)则通过手机实现了即时支付。这些项目共同大幅扩展了金融服务的可及性。在短短十年间,拥有数字银行账户的成年人比例几乎翻了一倍,达到了78%。女性账户持有率也增加了三倍,从而彻底消除了账户持有率的性别差距。这是一个大规模的经济赋权成果,而这一切都得益于印度在过去十年间迅速扩展的移动网络。


农业作为大多数发展中国家最大的产业和就业来源,也在从数字化转型中受益。在肯尼亚,一个包含600万个带有地理标签的农民位置的全国农民登记系统每周通过短信向农民发送作物和具体地点的天气预警。在卢旺达,一套为茶业工人设计的数字系统将茶叶交付到工资发放的时间从15天缩短到最多3天。


在医疗保健领域,数字公共基础设施也正在颠覆服务交付和支付系统。科特迪瓦和马里最近的脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种活动采用了一种数字化方法来跟踪人员的接种情况,并通过移动钱包实现即时支付。超过99%的接种人员在一周内收到报酬,而之前使用纸质系统通常需要几个月的时间。这种效率和可靠性如此显著,以至于几乎所有接种人员现在都更喜欢数字支付。但这不仅仅是按时支付的问题,而是建立对卫生系统的信任,以确保每个孩子都能获得挽救生命的疫苗。

左图:在刚果民主共和国,一名卫生工作者注册了移动钱包服务项目。
右图:一线卫生工作者玛萨拉·恩苏库(Masala Nsuku)现在将通过手机领取薪水,这将使她的收入更加可靠。

当新冠疫情爆发时,我们看到了DPI在危机应对中的作用。巴西迅速开发了一款与国家身份系统连接的智能手机应用和网站,使7000万人——其中40%之前没有银行账户——能够注册并领取紧急援助。多哥则在短短10天内从零开始构建了一个类似的系统,将社会救助覆盖范围从12000人扩大到180万人。这种对比非常鲜明:在那些仍依赖线下系统的国家,人们难以获得所需帮助;而在那些拥有健全数字生态系统的国家,援助能够更快、更高效地送达。对于许多家庭来说,DPI是贫困与温饱之间的关键差异。


但数字公共基础设施不仅在危机时期发挥作用,它还极大地改善了日常政府服务的获取。作为数字治理的先驱,爱沙尼亚于2001年推出了其X-Road平台。如今,该国99%的公共服务全天候在线提供。结果是,报税只需3到5分钟,注册企业仅需3小时。


| 这是因为,只要投资得当,各国就能利用DPI绕过过时且低效的系统,从而有可能将其发展进程加快十年以上。


在我的气候、技术和全球健康工作中,我有幸与许多国家的领导人会面。他们对DPI的热情显而易见。这是因为,只要投资得当,各国就能利用DPI绕过过时、低效的系统,立即采用最先进的数字解决方案,跨越传统的发展轨迹——有可能将其发展进程加快十年以上。那些没有广泛银行分支的国家可以直接迈入移动银行业务,以更低的成本覆盖更多的人口。同样,数字身份系统可以为数百万之前没有合法身份证明的人提供身份认证,使他们能够获得广泛的服务——从购买SIM卡、开设银行账户,到领取养老金等社会福利。


我也听到了一些关于DPI的担忧——以下是我的看法。许多人担心数字系统会成为监控的工具,但设计良好的DPI包含防止滥用的保护措施,甚至可以增强隐私保护。例如,一个好的数字身份系统可以让人们选择与谁共享哪些个人信息。它不会强制任何人参与,而是提供了因为其诸多好处而可以自愿选择的工具。这些系统还减少了对可能丢失或被盗的实体文件的需求,甚至可以创建审计跟踪,从而更容易发现和防止未经授权的访问。其目标是为人们赋能,而非限制他们。


人们还担心DPI会使农村社区、老年人或数字素养有限的人群处于不利地位。但如果设计得当、实施周全,DPI实际上能够增强包容性。例如,在印度,数百万之前没有银行账户的人现在可以使用金融服务,并且对于有身体残疾或无固定住址的人,也有生物识别例外和协助注册的服务。

在印度,一位女性使用身份证在银行进行交易。 

同时,各国可以利用开源工具,如MOSIP(用于数字身份)和Mojaloop(用于支付),来构建促进本地竞争和创新的DPI。通过提供一个通用的数字框架,这些工具允许小型公司和初创企业在不必从零搭建基础系统的情况下开发服务。更重要的是,这些工具能让国家能够找到适合其独特需求和挑战的服务,而不必依赖专有系统。


数字公共基础设施是我们在盖茨基金会推进许多工作的重要基础,包括保护儿童免受可预防疾病的侵害,加强医疗保健系统,改善农民的生活和生计,并赋权女性掌控她们的财务未来。这就是为什么我们如此重视DPI,并承诺在五年内投入2亿美元支持全球DPI项目。


随着全球共识的增强和成熟解决方案的出现,我们现在有一个独特的机会来应对这些挑战。未来是数字化的。让我们确保这是一个惠及所有人的未来。


Planes, trains, and smartphones


Almost thirty years ago, I wrote a book called The Road Ahead, about the transformative potential of the internet and other new digital technologies. Back then, I envisioned a world where online payments and e-government would change how we interact with money, services, and each other. Today, much of that has become a reality, in part due to the development of digital public infrastructure. In my recent travels around the world, I’ve seen up close how DPI is revolutionizing the way entire nations serve their people, respond to crises, and grow their economies. And at the Gates Foundation, we see it as an important part of our efforts to help save lives and fight poverty in poor countries.


There are a few core components that constitute DPI: digital ID systems that securely prove who you are, payment systems that move money instantly and cheaply, and data exchange platforms that allow different services to work together seamlessly. These systems and platforms are to the digital world what roads, bridges, and power lines are to the physical one—an underlying structure that connects people, data, and money online. Strong DPI can propel a country forward by making it easier for people to access essential services, participate in the formal economy, and improve their lives. On the flip side, DPI that is poorly implemented (or simply non-existent) can slow a country’s development and perpetuate inefficiencies and inequities.  


In the 21st century, digital public infrastructure is proving to be as important for progress as its brick-and-mortar predecessors—and the effects have been impressive around the world, wherever it’s been embraced.


Take India, where I spent time earlier this year. The country’s digital ID system, Aadhaar, gives every resident the ability to prove who they are, while its Unified Payments Interface facilitates instant payment via mobile phone. Together, these programs have expanded access to financial services dramatically. The proportion of adults with digital bank accounts nearly doubled, reaching 78 percent, in just ten years. And women’s account ownership tripled—which eliminated the gender gap in account ownership entirely. This is economic empowerment on a massive scale, unlocked by the country’s rapid expansion of mobile networks over the past decade.  


Agriculture, the largest industry and source of work in most developing countries, is also benefiting from digital transformation. In Kenya, a national farmer registry with 6 million geo-tagged farmer locations sends out weekly text messages with crop and site-specific weather alerts. In Rwanda, a digital system for workers in the tea industry reduced the time between delivery of tea leaves and receipt of wages from 15 days to a maximum of three.  


In healthcare, DPI is also shaking up service delivery and payment systems. Recent polio vaccination campaigns in Côte D’Ivoire and Mali used a digital approach to track vaccinator attendance, coupled with mobile money for instant payments. Over 99 percent of vaccinators were paid within a week, compared to months with previous paper-based systems. The efficiency and reliability were so compelling that almost all vaccinators now prefer digital payment. But this isn’t just about being paid on time—it’s about building trust in health systems so that life-saving vaccines can reach every child.


When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, we saw the role DPI can play in crisis response, too. Brazil rapidly developed a smartphone app and website linked to its national ID system, enabling 70 million people—40 percent of whom previously lacked bank accounts—to register for and receive emergency aid. Togo built a similar system from scratch in only 10 days, expanding social assistance coverage from 12,000 people to 1.8 million. The contrast was stark: In countries with offline systems, people were left in need—while those with robust digital ecosystems could deliver aid faster and more efficiently. For many families, DPI was the difference between poverty and putting food on the table.  


But digital public infrastructure isn’t just valuable in times of crisis—it can vastly improve access to everyday government services, too. Estonia, a pioneer in digital governance, launched its X-Road platform in 2001. Today, 99 percent of the country’s public services are available online around the clock. As a result, filing taxes takes three to five minutes while registering a business takes a mere three hours.


| That’s because, with the right investments, countries can use DPI to bypass outdated and inefficient systems, potentially accelerating their progress by more than a decade.


In my climate, tech, and global health work, I have the privilege of meeting with leaders from many countries. Their excitement about DPI is palpable. That’s because, with the right investments, countries can use DPI to bypass outdated and inefficient systems, immediately adopt cutting-edge digital solutions, and leapfrog traditional development trajectories—potentially accelerating their progress by more than a decade. Countries without extensive branch banking can move straight to mobile banking, reaching far more people at a fraction of the cost. Similarly, digital ID systems can provide legal identity to millions who previously lacked official documentation, giving them access to a wide range of services—from buying a SIM card to opening a bank account to receiving social benefits like pensions. 


I’ve heard concerns about DPI—here’s how I think about them. Many people worry digital systems are a tool for government surveillance. But properly designed DPI includes safeguards against misuse and even enhances privacy. A good digital ID system, for instance, lets people choose what personal information to share and with whom. It doesn’t force anyone to participate; it offers tools they can opt into because of the many benefits. These systems also reduce the need for physical document copies that can be lost or stolen, and even create audit trails that make it easier to detect and prevent unauthorized access. The goal is to empower people, not restrict them.


Then there’s the fear that DPI will disenfranchise vulnerable populations like rural communities, the elderly, or those with limited digital literacy. But when it’s properly designed and thoughtfully implemented, DPI actually increases inclusion—like in India, where millions of previously unbanked people now have access to financial services, and where biometric exceptions or assisted enrollment exist for people with physical disabilities or no fixed address. 





请到「今天看啥」查看全文