On seeing her thesis, Henry Norris Russell, an expert on the chemical composition of stars, told her that the result was “clearly impossible”. Four years later, Russell’s own calculations would lead him to admit that Payne had been right after all. The prevalence of hydrogen, he wrote at the end of his paper, “can hardly be doubted”. Unjustly, it was Russell at the time, not Payne, who was frequently credited with the discovery.
一位名为Henry Norris Russell的星球化学成分研究学者在看到了Cecilia Payne的论文后告知她该结论“很明显不可能”。四年后,Russell的计算最终让他不得不承认Payne是对的。他在自己的论文结尾中写道,氢的普遍存在“几乎不容置疑”。而不公平的是,当时Russell却成为了该发现多次被归功之人。