专栏名称: 先读午餐会
如果学术有墙,就用标题党拆掉它。
目录
相关文章推荐
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  先读午餐会

一份不正经的传播学理论课程大纲(第二版)

先读午餐会  · 公众号  ·  · 2017-08-28 20:26

正文

因为上学期这门课整整讲了四遍,所以我做了一份《不正经的传播理论课程大纲》,非常感谢学生的反馈、导师的鼓励。趁暑假,我做了一些调整,更新了这份课程大纲,同时详细列出了课程阅读材料,为下学期的课程做一些准备。


再次把这份课程大纲po出来(全都是辛勤的汗水),希望能对传播学的学习者有一点点微小的借鉴。这个大纲多多少少会渗透我自己的偏好,例如很少涉及欧洲批判学派的内容,这一部分我希望可以在今后继续补充。我在计划把这门课程写成一本书,也许明年就可以摆进书店了。


暑假没怎么更新这个地方,但这个月已经写了将近5万字,每天都在撸稿。另一个消息是,我也许会和一个我很喜欢的网站合作,将这个课程上线。希望自己踏实耕耘,不辜负自己和学生的时间。




课程名称: 传播学理论


第一周(9月22日):与我有什么关系

  • 社会科学的研究逻辑

  • 传播学的研究范畴


  • Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect incommunication. Public opinion quarterly, 47(1), 1-15.

  • Mind Hacks (2017). The Social Priming Studies in “Thinking Fast and Slow” are not very replicable. https://mindhacks.com/2017/02/16/how-replicable-are-the-social-priming-studies-in-thinking-fast-and-slow/. 

  • Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246.

  • Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E.(2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78, 78-86.


第二周(9月29日):自我呈现2.0

  • 生活中的表演策略

  • 微信朋友圈的呈现与遮蔽

  • 相亲网站的套路与反套路

  • 豆瓣中的品位表演


  • Attrill, A., (2015). The Manipulation of online self-presentation: Create, edit, re-edit and present. Hampshire. Palgrave Macmilan. 1-33.

  • Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self‐presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(2),415-441.

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The presentation of self in virtual life: Characteristics of personal home pages. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(3), 643-660.

  • Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation incomputer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538-2557.


第三周(10月6日):国庆假期


第三周(10月13日):如何在互联网时代获得明智生活

  • 新技术如何毁掉我们的生活

  • 互联网的馈赠与剥夺

  • 永远在线的生活真的尽如人意么

  • 社交网站中的喧闹与孤独


  • 尼尔·波兹曼(2004): 《娱乐至死》. 桂林. 广西师范大学出版社.

  • 尼古拉斯·卡尔(2010):《浅薄:互联网如何毒化了我们的大脑》. 北京. 中信出版社.

  • Baron, N. S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford University Press.

  • Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive controlin media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.


第五周(10月20日):传播中的人性较量(1)

  • 人人都是伪君子:为何我们的态度和行为常常相反

  • 疾病的隐喻:态度背后的隐秘心灵

  • 减肥并不困难:只要你了解为什么它并不容易


  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.

  • Fazio, R. H., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2005). Acting as We Feel: When and How Attitudes Guide Behavior. In T.C. Brock and M. C. Green(Eds), Persuasion: Psychlogical insights and perspectives (2rd Edition). Thousand Oaks. Sage.

  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public opinion quarterly, 24(2), 163-204.

  • LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social forces, 13(2), 230-237.

  • Moan, I. S., & Rise, J. (2011). Predicting intentions not to “drink and drive” using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(4), 1378-1384.


第六周(10月27日):传播中的人性较量(2)

  • 心血辩护:脑残粉如何在论战中自动回血

  • 认知的吝啬鬼:我们如何为思考寻找捷径


  • Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classictheory. Sage.

  • Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203.

  • Fried, C. B. (1998). Hypocrisy and identification with transgressions: A case of undetected dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 144-154.

  • Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. (2007). Who regrets more after choosing a non-status-quo option? Post decisional regret under need for cognitive closure. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(2),186-196.

  • Yi, Y., & Yoo, J. (2011). The longterm effects of sales promotions on brandattitude across monetary and nonmonetary promotions. Psychology & Marketing, 28(9), 879-896.


第七周(11月3日):说服的艺术与技术(1)

  • 广告神话学:为什么人们会为自己的幻觉买单?

  • 隐藏的说服者:如何向公众思想“投毒”


  • 哈贝马斯(1999):公共领域的结构转型. 上海. 学林出版社. 318-230.

  • 胡百精、董晨宇(2013):现代公共关系的哲学基础与民主悖论——以伯内斯的公关思想为研究和批判个案. 《新闻大学》. 2. 89-97.

  • 罗兰·巴特(1999). 《神话:大众文化诠释》. 上海. 上海人民出版社. 3-14, 33-35.

  • Lippmann, W. (1993). The Phantom public. New Brunswick. TransactionPublishers. 3-64.

  • Williamson, J. (1978). Decoding advertisements (Vol. 4). London: Marion Boyars. 20-39.


第八周(11月10日):说服的艺术与技术(2)

  • 框架的诡计:登门槛技术与得失策略

  • 恐惧诉求:烟盒上到底应该印些什么


  • Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 206.

  • Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of personality andsocial psychology, 4(2), 195.

  • O’Keefe, D. J. (1999). How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 22(1), 209-249.

  • O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In Dillard, J. P., & Pfau, M. (Eds). The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice. CA. Sage Publications. 329-244.

  • O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59(1),51-67.

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.


第九周(11月17日):隐私在云端

  • 没有秘密的世界:互联网中的隐私焦虑

  • 发现隐秘真相:搜索历史如何泄露人性

  • 窥探的快感:如何通过社交网站与EX藕断丝连


  • 丹尼尔·沙勒夫(2011). 隐私不保的年代. 南京. 江苏人民出版社.

  • 霍尔·涅兹维奇(2015). 我爱偷窥:为何我们爱上自我暴露和窥视他人. 北京. 世界图书出版公司.

  • Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. new media & society, 14(7),1164-1180.

  • Jansson, A. (2015). Interveillance: A new culture of recognition and mediatization. Media and Communication, 3(3). 81-90.

  • Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2017). Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are. Dey St.


第十周(11月24日):创新扩散及其社会结果(1)

  • 我不相信大众媒体:为什么人际传播至关重要

  • 引爆点:创新产品的扩散曲线


  • Al-Jabri, I. M., & Sohail, M. S. (2012). Mobile banking adoption: Application of diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4). 379-391.

  • Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P. K. (2010). Measuringuser influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. Icwsm, 10(10-17), 30.

  • Chang, H. C. (2010). A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of the Association forInformation Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-4.

  • Nisbet, M. C., & Kotcher, J. E. (2009). A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30(3), 328-354.

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural sociology, 8(1), 15-24.


第十一周(12月1日):创新扩散及其社会结果(2)

  • 无知者无畏:媒体在制造社会差异么

  • 数字鸿沟:为什么知识平等如此困难


  • DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P.(2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review ofsociology, 27(1), 307-336.

  • Gaziano, C. (2017). Knowledge Gap: History and Development. In Rossler, R. et al. (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1-12.

  • Hindman, D. B. (2009). Mass media flow and differential distribution of politically disputed beliefs: The belief gap hypothesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 790-808.

  • Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public opinion quarterly, 34(2), 159-170.

  • Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT press.


第十二周(12月8日):当沉默成为螺旋

  • 房间里的大象:我们为何选择沉默

  • 沉默的螺旋:媒体操纵的隐秘手段

  • 观点的极化效应:网帖下面的点赞和抹黑


  • Hampton, K. N., Rainie, H., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., &Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the 'spiral of silence'. Pew Research Center.

  • Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2015). “Was it something I said?” “No,it was something you posted!” A study of the spiral of silence theory in socialmedia contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 208-213.

  • Liu, X., & Fahmy, S. (2011). Exploring the spiral of silence inthe virtual world: lndividuals' willingness to express personal opinions inonline versus offline settings. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 3(2), 45.

  • Matthes, J., Rios Morrison, K., & Schemer, C. (2010). A spiralof silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions. Communication Research, 37(6), 774-800.

  • Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2),296-311.


第十三周(12月15日):自由的幻觉

  • 鲨鱼恐慌症:媒体如何扭曲现实?

  • 铺垫效果:媒体如何影响我们的思维路径?

  • 认知连线:重访我们脑海中的图景


  • McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4),703-717.

  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.

  • Russell Neuman, W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., & Bae, S. Y.(2014). The dynamics of public attention: Agendasetting theory meets big data. Journalof Communication, 64(2), 193-214.

  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journalof communication, 57(1), 9-20.

  • Vu, H. T., Guo, L., & McCombs, M. E. (2014). Exploring “the world outside and the pictures in our heads” A network agenda-setting study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(4), 669-686.


第十四周(12月22日):邪恶世界综合症

  • 媒介等同:为什么明星不愿演负面角色

  • 暴力时代:媒体为何让人们恐慌

  • 一切都烟消云散了么:数字时代的暴力与色情


  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of communication, 26(2), 172-194.

  • Lee, C. J., & Niederdeppe, J. (2011). Genre-specific cultivation effects: Lagged associations between overall TV viewing, local TV news viewing, and fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention. Communication Research, 38(6), 731-753.

  • Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (2010). The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2),337-355.

  • Stossel, S. (1997). The man who counts the killings. Atlantic, 279, 86-98.

  • Williams, D. (2006). Virtual cultivation: Online worlds, offline perceptions. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 69-87.


第十五周(12月29日):百度一下,你就知道…什么了

  • 理解把关人:谁在掌管我们的餐桌

  • 什么决定新闻:新闻室中的权力较量

  • 回声室效应:互联网为何会让我们的信息更加闭塞


  • Bastos, M. T., Raimundo, R. L. G., & Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: message diffusion in political hashtags. Media,Culture & Society, 35(2), 260-270.

  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.

  • Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New media & society, 16(1),55-73.

  • Tandoc Jr, E. C. (2014). Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media &Society, 16(4), 559-575.

  • Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.




感谢阅读,托蒂镇楼。