对于我们来说,摄影和科学究竟有多可靠?赵仁辉在《世界动植物漫游指南》中探究了这些问题。这本书看起来像是一份关于动植物的真实目录,但事实是它纯属虚构。
《世界动植物漫游指南》表面“记录”了55种被人类操纵的动物、植物及环境(但事实上并未被操纵),并且试验了无数种人类企图改变自然的方法。指南中有一些非常有趣的生物,它们以一种意想不到的方式进化以适应这不断变化的世界。这些生物包括几乎看不到犄角的犀牛,还有靠人喂食的猴子。这一体系中的其他生物都是人类干预和基因突变工程的产物。它们为从科学研究到装饰要求等多种目的服务,例如:人造明胶葡萄、转基因西红柿和“不碎”鸡蛋。
所有生物都在不断适应着它们面临的各种压力,包括来自捕食者、污染和环境改变的压力。然而,毫无疑问,人类就是威胁其他生命形式的罪魁祸首。《世界动植物漫游指南》提醒着我们这样一个事实,尤其是对于“真相”保持批判的、谨慎的、讽刺的态度。
在摄影上,赵仁辉的实践都来自于对于自然世界的观察和研究。但那不是直接的根据,相反,他用叙述的方式构建和区分主体的层次,将现实和虚构交织在一起,在读者的内心播下疑问的种子,使之思考在他们面前的图像是否客观存在
。
To what extent can we trust photography and science? Robert Zhao Renhui explores these questions in A Guide to the Flora and Fauna of the World, which appears to be an authentic catalogue of plants and animals but is in fact entirely fictitious.
Renhui’s guide ostensibly “documents” 55 different animals, plants and environments that have been manipulated by man but do not appear to be, and examines the myriad ways in which humans are altering nature. Here are curious creatures that have evolved in often unexpected ways to cope with our changing world, including rhinoceroses with barely visible horns and monkeys dependent on food handed out by humans. Other organisms in the series are the products of human intervention, mutations engineered to serve various purposes from scientific research to the desire for ornamentation, such as man-made gelatin grapes, genetically modified tomatoes and “unbreakable” eggs.
All living things constantly adapt to the various pressures they face including predators, pollution and environmental change. Yet the human species has undeniably emerged as the main perpetrator of the dangers that threaten the survival of other life forms. A Guide to the Flora and Fauna of the World reminds us of this fact, and above all to retain a critical, cautious and ironic attitude to the “real.”
Primarily photographic, Zhao’s practice is drawn from observations and research into the natural world. But it is not direct documentation; instead, he constructs and layers the subject with narratives, interweaving the real and the fictional, sowing a seed of doubt in viewers about the objectivity of the image before them.