So a lot turns on what rate is chosen. For historical reasons, the ADB adopts a high one of 12%. At that rate, Yuan-Mo’s ratio of expected benefits to costs equals 1.5, roughly in line with the authors’ assumptions. But at a gentler rate of 9%, the ratio improves to about 2. At a rate of 5.3% (more in line with government borrowing costs) the ratio rises to 3. With these higher margins for error, many fewer elephants turn white. At a ratio of 2, the share falls to 28%. If the ratio is assumed to be 3, the proportion of duds falls to just 8%.
所以许多事取决于选择什么利率。由于历史原因,亚行选择12%的高利率。按这个利率算,沅磨高速预期收益和成本比是1.5,大体符合作者的假设。但在更和缓的9%的利率下,比例大约提高到2。在5.3%的利率下(更符合政府的借款成本)比例升高到3。有这些更高的利润留出误差余地,昂贵而无用的基础建设工程会减少很多。在2%的利率下,无用工程的比重下降到28%。如果假定比例是3,其比重下降到仅有8%。
The authors also assume that any traffic shortfall persists throughout its life. That is not always the case. Traffic on Yuan-Mo, for example, has rebounded, according to the road’s operator. By 2015 it was 31% higher than the ADB projected back in 1999. Around last year’s lunar new-year holiday the road handled record numbers. Some white elephants turn grey with age.
作者还认为,任何交通量不足的情况会持续整个生命周期。情况并不总是如此。例如沅磨高速的交通量,根据道路运营商所说,已经有所回升。到2015年,它比亚行在1999年的预测要高出31%。在去年春节假期前后,沅磨高速处理的交通量创下纪录。随着时间推移,有些工程充当摆设的局面开始好转。