专栏名称: 唧唧堂
唧唧堂学术管理分享平台,更好的学术阅读与写作!
目录
相关文章推荐
河南新闻广播  ·  胖东来,新动作来了! ·  昨天  
河南新闻广播  ·  苏英杰严重违纪违法被双开 ·  昨天  
河南新闻广播  ·  蜜雪冰城今起招股,预计3月3日挂牌上市 ·  3 天前  
河南新闻广播  ·  梁东雁接受纪律审查和监察调查 ·  4 天前  
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  唧唧堂

唧唧堂:RFS金融学研究评论2021年3月论文摘要

唧唧堂  · 公众号  ·  · 2021-04-18 23:46

正文

picture from Internet
解析作者 | 唧唧堂经济金融学写作小组: YOUNG已不YOUNG
审校 | 唧唧堂经济金融学写作小组: SAN, 绵绵
编辑 | 悠悠


1. 标记经济学:动态采纳与估值。

Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation


我们开发了一个加密货币/代币的动态资产定价模型,允许用户在数字平台上进行点对点交易。代币的均衡价格是通过聚合用户的不同交易需求来确定的,而不是像标准估值模型那样对现金流进行贴现。内生的平台采用建立在用户网络外部性的基础上,并呈现S曲线:开始缓慢,变得不稳定,最终逐渐减少。代币的引入通过让用户从平台增长中获利,降低了用户在平台上的交易成本。由此产生的用户采用率和令牌价格之间的跨期反馈加速了采用率,并降低了用户群的波动性。


We develop a dynamic asset pricing model of cryptocurrencies/tokens that allow users to conduct peer-to-peer transactions on digital platforms. The equilibrium price of tokens is determined by aggregating heterogeneous users’ transactional demand, rather than discounting cash flows as is done in standard valuations models. Endogenous platform adoption builds on user network externality and exhibits an S-curve: it starts slow, becomes volatile, and eventually tapers off. The introduction of tokens lowers users’ transaction costs on the platform by allowing users to capitalize on platform growth. The resultant intertemporal feedback between user adoption and token price accelerates adoption and dampens user-base volatility.


参考文献:Lin William Cong, Ye Li, Neng Wang, Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1105–1155, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa089



2. 无浪费区块链:利害关系证明

Blockchain without Waste: Proof-of-Stake


未经许可的区块链需要协议来生成共识。许多著名的未经许可的区块链都使用工作证明(PoW)来实现这一目的,但PoW有很大的缺点。各种替代方案已经被提出。本文为最著名的替代方案--利益证明(POS)提供了第一个正式的经济模型,并建立了POS产生共识的条件。一个足够适度的奖励计划不仅意味着存在共识尽快达成的均衡,而且还排除了持久的分叉均衡。后一种结果的出现是因为POS与POW不同,它要求验证者也是利益相关者。


Permissionless blockchains require a protocol to generate consensus. Many prominent permissionless blockchains employ Proof-of-Work (PoW) for that purpose, but PoW possesses significant shortcomings. Various alternatives have been proposed. This paper provides the first formal economic model of the most famous alternative, Proof-of-Stake (PoS), and establishes conditions under which PoS generates consensus. A sufficiently modest reward schedule not only implies the existence of an equilibrium in which consensus obtains as soon as possible but also precludes a persistent forking equilibrium. The latter result arises because PoS, unlike PoW, requires that validators are also stakeholders.


参考文献:Fahad Saleh, Blockchain without Waste: Proof-of-Stake, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1156–1190, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa075



3. 集中式矿池中的分散开采

Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools


用于风险分担的集中式矿池的兴起并不一定会破坏区块链所需的去中心化:由于矿工的跨池多元化和池管理者的内生费用设定,较大的矿池更好地将其对全域哈希率的外部性进行内部化,收取更高的费用,吸引的矿工不成比例地少,增长也更慢。取而代之的是,矿池作为一种金融创新升级了矿商的军备竞赛,并大幅增加了基于工作证明的区块链的能源消耗。来自比特币挖掘的经验证据支持了我们模型的预测。经济洞察力为其他共识协议和主流行业的产业组织提供了信息,这些行业具有相似的特征,但先前的发现含糊不清。


The rise of centralized mining pools for risk sharing does not necessarily undermine the decentralization required for blockchains: because of miners’ cross-pool diversification and pool managers’ endogenous fee setting, larger pools better internalize their externality on global hash rates, charge higher fees, attract disproportionately fewer miners, and grow more slowly. Instead, mining pools as a financial innovation escalate miners’ arms race and significantly increase the energy consumption of proof-of-work-based blockchains. Empirical evidence from Bitcoin mining supports our model’s predictions. The economic insights inform other consensus protocols and the industrial organization of mainstream sectors with similar characteristics but ambiguous prior findings.


参考文献:Lin William Cong, Zhiguo He, Jiasun Li, Decentralized Mining in Centralized Pools, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1191–1235, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa040


picture from Internet


4. 不确定性、投资者情绪与创新

Uncertainty, Investor Sentiment, and Innovation


我们发展了一个基于奈特不确定性的创新浪潮、投资者情绪和并购活动的理论。厌恶不确定性的投资者对一项创新更乐观,因为他们可以同时投资于多个不确定的项目。当创新公司增长到临界数量时,创新浪潮就会出现,其特点是投资者情绪更强,股票估值更高,首次公开募股(IPO)市场火爆。我们对待投资者情绪的方法并不是基于与经济基本面脱节的错误信念,而是取决于基本面的不确定性。我们的模型可以解释特定行业的繁荣与总体经济活动和整体股市无关。


We develop a theory of innovation waves, investor sentiment, and merger activity based on Knightian uncertainty. Uncertainty-averse investors are more optimistic on an innovation when they can make contemporaneous investments in multiple uncertain projects. Innovation waves occur when there is a critical mass of innovative companies, and are characterized by stronger investor sentiment, higher equity valuation, and hot initial public offering markets. Our approach to investor sentiment is not based on erroneous beliefs disjoint from economic fundamentals, but depends on uncertainty on the fundamentals. Our model can explain sector-specific booms uncorrelated with aggregate economic activity and the overall stock market.


参考文献:David Dicks, Paolo Fulghieri, Uncertainty, Investor Sentiment, and Innovation, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1236–1279, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa065



5. 创新与知情交易:来自行业ETF的证据

Innovation and Informed Trading: Evidence from Industry ETFs


我们实证检验了行业交易所交易基金(IETF)对知情交易和市场效率的影响。我们发现,IETF的空头利率与对冲基金持有的会员股票在正向额外收益之前同时飙升,反映了做多股票/做空ETF的活动。这一模式在行业风险敞口较高的个股中更为明显。对ETF启动事件的差异分析表明,在行业风险敞口较高的股票中,IETF更多地减少了盈利公告后的漂移,这表明IETF提高了市场效率。我们还发现,IETF的空头利率与IETF的收益成正比,这与IETF的对冲作用是一致的。


We empirically examine the impact of industry exchange-traded funds (IETFs) on informed trading and market efficiency. We find that IETF short interest spikes simultaneously with hedge fund holdings on the member stock before positive earnings surprises, reflecting long-the-stock/short-the-ETF activity. This pattern is stronger among stocks with high industry risk exposure. A difference-in-difference analysis on the ETF inception event shows that IETFs reduce post-earnings-announcement drift more among stocks with high industry risk exposure, suggesting that IETFs improve market efficiency. We also find that the short interest ratio of IETFs positively predicts IETF returns, consistent with the hedging role of IETFs.


参考文献:Shiyang Huang, Maureen O’Hara, Zhuo Zhong, Innovation and Informed Trading: Evidence from Industry ETFs, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1280–1316, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa077



6. 境外机构投资者提高价格效率了吗?

Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency?


我们利用公司层面的国际数据研究了境外机构投资者对价格效率的影响。我们使用摩根士丹利资本国际指数(MSCI Index)和美国就业与增长税减免协调法案(US Jobs And Growth Tax Desiliation Acciliation Act)的新增数据作为外资持股的外生冲击,发现外资持股增加会增加股价信息,尤其是在发达经济体。这一增长源于外国投资者带来的新信息,以及信息较少的国内散户投资者的转移。最后,我们发现,外资持股,特别是来自活跃投资者的持股,增加了市场流动性,降低了公司的股权成本,并增加了公司的实际投资增长。


We study the impact of foreign institutional investors on price efficiency with firm-level international data. Using additions to the MSCI index and the U.S. Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act as exogenous shocks to foreign ownership, we show that greater foreign ownership increases stock price informativeness, especially in developed economies. This increase arises from new information that foreign investors bring in and displacement of less-informed domestic retail investors. Finally, we show that foreign ownership, particularly from active investors, increases market liquidity, reduces firms’ cost of equity, and increases firms’ real investment growth.


参考文献:Marcin Kacperczyk, Savitar Sundaresan, Tianyu Wang, Do Foreign Institutional Investors Improve Price Efficiency?, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1317–1367, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa076


picture from Internet


7. 投资者保护与资本脆弱性:来自全球对冲基金的证据

Investor Protection and Capital Fragility: Evidence from Hedge Funds around the World


我们发现,不同国家对冲基金的资本流动受到投资者保护法力度和执行程度的影响。与保护力度较强的国家的基金相比,位于投资者保护较弱国家的对冲基金对业绩不佳表现出更大的投资者外流敏感性。此外,投资者保护不力与基金经理参与更多的回报管理有关。我们的发现表明,在投资者保护较弱的国家,糟糕的基金表现使投资者面临更大的欺诈风险和法律风险,从而引发更大的资本外流。


We find that capital flows to hedge funds in different countries are influenced by the strength and the enforcement of investor protection laws. Hedge funds located in weak investor protection countries exhibit greater sensitivity of investor outflow to poor performance, relative to funds in countries with strong protection. Furthermore, weak investor protection is associated with fund managers engaging in greater returns management. Our findings suggest that in countries with weaker investor protection, poor fund performance exposes investors to a greater risk of fraud and legal jeopardy, thus triggering a larger outflow of capital.


参考文献:George O Aragon, Vikram Nanda, Haibei Zhao, Investor Protection and Capital Fragility: Evidence from Hedge Funds around the World, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1368–1407, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa051



8. 储蓄过剩与金融脆弱性

Savings Gluts and Financial Fragility


我们提出了一个基于激励的理论,即储蓄过剩是如何导致金融脆弱性的。必须激励发起人产出高质量的资产。资产被分配给知情的中介机构或不知情的投资者。储蓄过剩通过压缩知情中介为优质资产支付的价格与不知情的投资者为普通资产支付的价格之间的利差,降低了发起人的动机。利差的收窄放松了中介机构的借贷约束,导致了更高的杠杆率。这就产生了金融脆弱性:如果出现不可预见的损失,中介机构更有可能资不抵债。我们的模型为全球金融危机的爆发提供了一个连贯的叙述。


We propose an incentive-based theory of how a savings glut produces financial fragility. Originators must be incentivized to produce high-quality assets. Assets are distributed to informed intermediaries or uninformed investors. A savings glut reduces origination incentives by compressing spreads between the prices paid for high-quality assets by informed intermediaries and prices paid by uninformed investors for generic assets. The narrowing of spreads relaxes intermediaries’ borrowing constraints, resulting in higher leverage. This generates financial fragility: intermediaries are more likely to become insolvent if unforeseen losses arise. Our model offers a coherent narrative of the run-up to the Global Financial Crisis.


参考文献:Patrick Bolton, Tano Santos, Jose A Scheinkman, Savings Gluts and Financial Fragility, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1408–1444, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa074



9. 逐渐缓和的情绪:量化宽松、其后果和新兴市场资本流动

Taper Tantrums: Quantitative Easing, Its Aftermath, and Emerging Market Capital Flows


本文考察了美国非常规货币政策(UMP)对新兴市场资本流动和资产价格的溢出效应。仿射期限结构模型估计显示,以高频国债期货数据识别的美国货币政策冲击代表着对预期短期收益率和期限溢价的修正,特别是在UMP期间。政策冲击对美国持有的新兴市场资产产生了相当大的影响。这些影响通过估值变化与实物流动不成比例地体现出来,相对于债券市场,股票市场表现得更明显,而且在量化宽松和缩减量化宽松期间是不对称的,资金流动在平仓期间更加重要。


This paper examines the spillover effects of U.S. unconventional monetary policy (UMP) on emerging market capital flows and asset prices. Affine term structure model estimates show that U.S. monetary policy shocks, identified with high-frequency Treasury futures data, represent revisions to expected short-term yields and term premia, especially during the UMP period. The policy shocks exhibit sizable effects on U.S. holdings of emerging market assets. These effects disproportionately manifest through valuation changes versus physical flows, are more pronounced for equity relative to bond markets, and are asymmetric between the quantitative easing and tapering periods, with flows more important during the unwinding.


参考文献:Anusha Chari, Karlye Dilts Stedman, Christian Lundblad, Taper Tantrums: Quantitative Easing, Its Aftermath, and Emerging Market Capital Flows, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1445–1508, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa044


picture from Internet


10. 资产绝缘体

Asset Insulators


我们构建了一个新的数据集,在个股级别跟踪寿险公司资产的日价值。在2008-2009年危机之外,资产市值每下降1美元,保险公司的市场股本就会减少0.10美元。在金融危机期间,这一传递升至1美元。我们将保险公司视为资产绝缘体,即拥有稳定的长期负债的机构,能够安然度过市场价格的短暂混乱,从而解释了这种现象。在危机期间,保险公司的市场权益比其证券经久期调整后的价值减少了500亿美元,这说明了绝缘在宏观经济上的重要性。


We construct a new data set tracking the daily value of life insurers’ assets at the security level. Outside of the 2008–2009 crisis, a $ 1 drop in the market value of assets reduces an insurer’s market equity by $ 0.10. During the financial crisis, this pass-through rises to $ 1. We explain this pattern by viewing insurance companies as asset insulators, institutions with stable, long-term liabilities that can ride out transitory dislocations in market prices. Illustrating the macroeconomic importance of insulation, insurers’ market equity declined by $50 billion less than the duration-adjusted value of their securities during the crisis.


参考文献:Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Andra Ghent, Valentin Haddad, Asset Insulators, The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 34, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 1509–1539, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa061



11. 碳尾风险

Carbon Tail Risk


应对气候变化需要强有力的监管行动,但气候政策的不确定性使投资者难以量化未来气候监管的影响。我们表明,这种不确定性在期权市场中是被定价的。对于碳排放密集型商业模式的公司来说,针对下行尾部风险的期权保护成本更高。对于碳排放密集型企业来说,当公众对气候变化的关注激增时,防范下行尾部风险的成本会被放大,在对气候变化持怀疑态度的特朗普总统当选后,这一成本会降低。


Strong regulatory actions are needed to combat climate change, but climate policy uncertainty makes it difficult for investors to quantify the impact of future climate regulation. We show that such uncertainty is priced in the option market. The cost of option protection against downside tail risks is larger for firms with more carbon-intense business models. For carbon-intense firms, the cost of protection against downside tail risk is magnified at times when the public’s attention to climate change spikes, and it decreased after the election of climate change skeptic President Trump.







请到「今天看啥」查看全文