专栏名称: 金融经济学
传播金融学前沿研究动态
目录
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  金融经济学

American Finance Association 2020 Annual Meeting(66)

金融经济学  · 公众号  ·  · 2020-03-04 21:30

正文

66期


编辑:傅延琪  审核:朱清源

Topic 66 : Household Debt and Savings

  • Perceived Precautionary Savings Motives: Evidence from FinTech

  • Medicaidand Household Savings Behavior: New Evidence from Tax Refunds

  • Reducing Barriers to Enrollment in Federal Student Loan Repayment Plans: Evidence fromthe Navient Field Experiment

1、Perceived Precautionary Savings Motives: Evidence from FinTech

Working paper , issued in January 2019


Francesco D'Acunto, Boston College
Thomas Rauter,
University of Chicago
Christoph Scheuch,
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Michael Weber,
University of Chicago


Abstract

We study the consumption response to the introduction of a mobile overdraft facility on a FinTech app. Users react to the availability of the overdraft by increasing their consumption spending permanently and reallocating consumption from non-discretionary to discretionary goods and services. For identification, we exploit sharp discontinuities in the size of the overdraft limit based on an income rounding rule the app uses to assign credit limits. In the cross section, we find similar responses for young and old users, users with high and low income volatility, and users with steep and flat income paths. The most liquid users—those with high ratios of deposits to income inflows—drive the consumption spending response. These results are not fully consistent with models of financial constraints, buffer stock models with and without durables, present-bias preferences, or the canonical life-cycle permanent income model. We discuss a new channel, the perceived precautionary savings channel, which appears consistent with all our results. Under this channel, households with higher liquid wealth behave as if they faced strong precautionary savings motives even though no observables suggests they should do so.


原文链接:

https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=AFA2020&paper_id=299


2、 Medicaid and Household Savings Behavior: New Evidence from Tax Refunds

Working paper , issued in March 2019


Emily Gallagher, University of Colorado, Boulder
Radhakrishnan Gopalan,
Washington University in St. Louis
Michal Grinstein-Weiss,
Washington University in St. Louis
Jorge Sabat,
Washington University in St Louis


Abstract

Using data on over 57,000 low-income tax filers, we estimate the effect of Medicaid access on the propensity of households to save or repay debt from their tax refunds. We instrument for Medicaid access using variation in state eligibility rules. We find substantial heterogeneity across households in the savings response to Medicaid. Households that are not experiencing financial hardship behave in a manner consistent with a precautionary savings model, meaning they save less under Medicaid. In contrast, among households experiencing financial hardship, Medicaid eligibility increases refund savings rates by roughly 5 percentage points or $102. For both sets of households, effects are stronger in states with lower bankruptcy exemption limits – consistent with uninsured, financially constrained households using bankruptcy to manage health expenditure risk. Our results imply that expansions to the social safety net may affect the magnitude of the consumption response to tax rebates.


原文链接:

https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=AFA2020&paper_id=530


3、 Reducing Barriers to Enrollment in Federal Student Loan Repayment Plans: Evidence fromthe Navient Field Experiment

Working paper , issued in March 2019


HolgerMueller, New York University
Constantine Yannelis,
University of Chicago







请到「今天看啥」查看全文