专栏名称: 唧唧堂
唧唧堂学术管理分享平台,更好的学术阅读与写作!
目录
相关文章推荐
51好读  ›  专栏  ›  唧唧堂

唧唧堂:OS组织科学2020年11-12月刊论文摘要14篇

唧唧堂  · 公众号  ·  · 2021-01-22 23:04

正文

picture from Internet

解析作者 | 唧唧堂管理学研究小组:DDRACHE
审校 | 唧唧堂管理学研究小组:明月奴
推送编辑 | 悠悠



1、与巨人共舞:女性和少数族裔拥有的小型企业如何利用软实力管理与大型合作伙伴的不对称关系


我们探讨少数族裔和女性所拥有的、缺乏硬实力的供应商该如何在供应商多元化关系的背景下,管理与更大型、实力更强的采购商之间的不对称关系。我们研究这些供应商如何创造和利用软实力,来管理他们在大型采购商供应链中维持地位时遇到的机会和挑战。我们发现,这些可替代的公司会使用各种各样的信息源,来使自己成为采购组织内外部的个人的认知中心,这些人可以作为职能和政治影响者。然后,当供应商在供应链中的地位受到威胁时,就会雇用这些人来影响采购商的决策,而这在很大程度上并未引起采购商的注意。本文的研究有助于对采购商-供应商权力关系中的软实力使用和供应商多样性的文献研究。


We explore how minority- and women-owned suppliers lacking hard power manage asymmetric relationships with larger, more powerful buyers in the context of supplier diversity relationships. We examine how these suppliers create and use soft power to manage the opportunities and challenges they encounter trying to maintain their positions in large buyers’ supply chains. We find that these easily substitutable firms use a variety of information sources to identify and make themselves cognitively central to individuals inside and outside the buyer organizations who can serve as functional and political influencers. They then employ these influencers to affect the buyer’s decisions when their position in the supply chain is threatened, largely without the buyer noticing. Our study contributes to the literatures on the use of soft power buyer-supplier power relationships and supplier diversity.


参考文献:Kisha Lashley , Timothy G. Pollock. (2020). Dancing with Giants: How Small Women- and Minority-Owned Firms Use Soft Power to Manage Asymmetric Relationships with Larger Partners, 31(6), 1313-1335. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1353



2、创业团队资源供应的悖论:在自身利益与企业集体之间


本文将创业视为一种集体行动,研究在创业团队中依靠集体努力取得成功与个体成员隐藏个人资源的倾向之间的紧张关系。我们认为,成立初期的不稳定性以及为其他用途重新部署资源的困难,增加了早期资源贡献的风险,并可能导致团队成员扣留资源甚至搭便车行为。有两个条件可以帮助克服这种集体行动问题:通过正式合同具体规定奖励和惩罚措施,以及通过首席企业家的自愿捐款鼓励团队成员进行相互交流。通过对具有全国代表性的美国企业家团队进行多波研究分析,我们发现,早期团队成员是不愿意提供企业资源的,即使这些资源对于企业生存至关重要。但预先签署正式合同和创始企业家的初始贡献,能够增大成员贡献此类资源的可能性。首席企业家对其企业的自愿捐助,通过提供给自己带来高风险但增强企业生存能力的资源,缓解了创业团队内部的集体行动问题。


Viewing entrepreneurship as a form of collective action, this paper investigates the tension between an entrepreneurial team’s reliance on collective efforts for achieving success and individual members’ tendencies to withhold their personal resources. We argue that the precarious nature of the early founding stage and the difficulty of redeploying some resources for other uses amplify the risk of early-stage resource contributions and may lead to team members withholding resources or even free riding. Two conditions may help overcome such collective action problems: adopting a formal contract to specify rewards and sanctions and encouraging reciprocal exchange among team members through the lead entrepreneur’s voluntary contributions. Analyzing a nationally representative multiwave panel study of entrepreneurial teams in the United States, we show that early-stage team members are reluctant to provide resources tailored to the business, even though such resources are critical to venture survival. We find that presigned formal contracts and founding entrepreneurs’ initial contributions make members’ contributions of such resources much more likely. Lead entrepreneurs’ voluntary contributions to their businesses, signified by their provision of resources that impose high risks on themselves but increase the viability of the business, help mitigate collective action problems within entrepreneurial teams.


参考文献:Tiantian Yang , Jiayi Bao, Howard Aldrich. (2020). The Paradox of Resource Provision in Entrepreneurial Teams: Between Self-Interest and the Collective Enterprise, 31(6), 1136-1358. doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1354



3、企业治理实践传播中的文化创业:在美上市的中国公司“独立董事”的构成


虽然不同公司治理实践的文化期望的多样性已经得到承认,但在企业如何利用文化差异使其治理实践的选择合法化并促进资源获取方面,我们的理解仍然有限。基于文化创业文献,我们从理论上分析了外国上市公司如何参与全球框架,以适应东道国投资者对其新治理实践的描述。我们的实证研究考察当母国和东道国对其角色理解不同时,美国上市的中国公司独立董事对监控资源提供者的相对重视程度。研究发现,通过董事会成员的海外教育和外国机构所有权接触东道国的另类文化储备,可以增强企业参与全球框架的组织资源。然而,全球框架的可能性受到母国制度环境的限制,也就是当地的商业历史和与强大的当地资源提供者(如国家)的联系。我们还发现,当公司在母国缺乏履行独立董事兼监督职责的能力时,全球框架在获得东道国投资者认可方面的有效性受到了限制。


Although the diversity of cultural expectations for different corporate governance practices has been acknowledged, our understanding of how companies use cultural differences to legitimize their governance practice choice and facilitate their resource acquisition remains limited. Building on the literature on cultural entrepreneurship, we theorize how foreign-listed firms engage in global framing in tailoring the description of their new governance practice to the host country investors. Our empirical study examines the relative emphasis of monitoring over resource-providing roles by the U.S.-listed Chinese companies’ independent directors when their roles are understood differently in the home and host countries. Our study finds that exposure to the alternative cultural repertoire of a host country via overseas education of board members and foreign institutional ownership enhance a firm’s organizational resources available to engage in global framing. The likelihood of global framing, however, is constrained by the home country’s institutional environment, which is characterized by local business history and connections to strong local resource providers such as the state. We also find that the effectiveness of global framing to obtain investor recognition in the host country is restricted when the company lacks the capacity to implement the declared role of independent director-as-monitor in its home country.


参考文献:Sun Hyun Park , Yanlong Zhang. (2020). Cultural Entrepreneurship in Corporate Governance Practice Diffusion: Framing of “Independent Directors” by U.S.-Listed Chinese Companies, 31(6), 1359-1384. doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1355


picture from Internet


4、组织间关系的中观基础:团队权力结构如何塑造新的合作


新的外部合作关系是有价值的,但也是有风险的,学者们已经在组织和个人层面研究了公司建立这些新合作关系的决定因素。然而,在执行复杂且知识密集型工作的组织中,有关组织间关系的决策通常是在团队内部做出的。我们将这些决策描述为一个两阶段的过程,在这个过程中,团队成员提出一个合作伙伴,其他团队成员则对此提议作出回应、支持或质疑。由于新的合作关系是有风险的,而权力是决定冒险倾向的关键因素,我们认为,团队成员的权力——无论是提议发起人还是回应者——将决定团队追求新型外部合作关系的可能性。利用一家自动化设备设计和制造公司的项目团队人员数据,我们发现权力对于新合作采用可能性的影响取决于权力类型和个人在决策过程中的角色。当发起提案人拥有正式的结构权力时,新合作伙伴的选择更有可能发生,但当发起人拥有非正式权力时,选择新合作伙伴的可能性较小。团队成员的正式和非正式权力都会削弱发起者权力的影响,因此,团队成员拥有的权力越大,发起者自身权力对新的外部合作伙伴选择的影响就越小。最后,我们提供的证据表明,这些对新合作伙伴采用可能性的影响,与项目团队可用的其他战略选择一样,都对项目成果具有重大作用。这些发现对组织网络的组织内决定因素研究具有启示意义。


Novel external partnerships are valuable but risky, and scholars have examined the organization- and individual-level determinants of firms’ decisions to pursue these new relationships. Yet, in organizations performing complex and knowledge-intensive work, decisions about interorganizational relationships are often made within teams. We characterize these decisions as a two-stage process in which a team member proposes a partner and other team members respond, supporting or challenging the proposal. As novel partnerships are risky, and power is a key determinant of risk-taking propensity, we argue that the power of team members—both those who initiate proposals and those who respond—will shape the likelihood that the team will pursue a novel external partnership. Using personnel data from project teams in an automated equipment design and build firm, we find that the effect of power on the likelihood of novel partner adoption depends on both the type of power and the role of the person in the decision process. Novel partner selection is more likely when those initiating proposals hold formal structural power but less likely when initiators hold informal power. Both the formal and informal power of the initiator’s teammates attenuate the effect of initiator power, such that the more power one’s teammates have, the less one’s own power will affect the likelihood of novel external partner selection. Finally, we provide evidence that these effects on likelihood of novel partner adoption are as materially consequential for project outcomes as other strategic choices available to project teams. These findings have implications for the intraorganizational determinants of interorganizational networks.


参考文献:Trevor Young-Hyman, Adam M. Kleinbaum. (2020). Meso-Foundations of Interorganizational Relationships: How Team Power Structures Shape Partner Novelty, 31(6), 1385-1407. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1356



5、碰壁的同情心:人类服务工作者何时以及如何克服障碍进行关怀


过去文献中一个关键的假设是,服务人员在情感上与他们的服务对象(如客户或病人)较为疏远。这种疏远是为了保护员工免受工作情绪消耗的困扰,但却给员工富有同情心的情感和行为带来了挑战。由于对在这种情况下同情发生的时间和方式知之甚少,我们采用访谈和观察法对119名美国惩教人员进行了多阶段的定性研究。在警官的描述以及我们对警官与囚犯互动的观察中,包括了残忍的、惩罚性的、无情的和富有同情心的对待。这种对待方式随警官所面临的情况而变化,当囚犯行为不端时,同情是令人惊讶的普遍现象,它挑战了人们对工作中同情心发生的理解。通过更仔细地研究警官的理由陈述,我们发现了一种新的解释机制,即使在如此困难的情况下,服务人员的工作也可以富有同情心。我们发现,警官描述了他们从事以下行为的实践(a)通过平衡自身与服务对象之间基于群体的差异来与他人建立联系;(b)通过保护自己免受指控所引发的负面情绪的影响而进行自我保护。我们认为,综合使用这些做法可以抵消工作中不同的情绪紧张,而不仅仅是提供情感距离,并且这样做可以在一些最艰难的情况和同情心的组织障碍下,促进富有同情心的对待方式。


A key assumption in past literature has been that human services workers become emotionally distant from their charges (such as clients or patients). Such distancing is said to protect workers from the emotionally draining aspects of the job but creates challenges to feeling and behaving compassionately. Because little is known about when and how compassion occurs under these circumstances, we conducted a multiphased qualitative study of 119 correctional officers in the United States using interviews and observations. Officers’ accounts and our observations of their interactions with inmates included cruel, disciplinary, unemotional, and compassionate treatment. Such treatment varied by the situations that officers faced, and compassion was surprisingly common when inmates were misbehaving—challenging current understanding of the occurrence of compassion at work. Examining officers’ accounts more closely, we uncovered a novel way that we theorize human services workers can be compassionate, even under such difficult circumstances. We find that officers describe engaging in practices in which they (a) relate to others by leveling group-based differences between themselves and their charges and (b) engage in self-protection by shielding themselves from the negative emotions triggered by their charges. We posit that the combined use of such practices offsets different emotional tensions in the work, rather than only providing emotional distance, and in doing so, can foster compassionate treatment under some of the most trying situations and organizational barriers to compassion.


参考文献:Katherine A. DeCelles ,Michel Anteby. (2020). Compassion in the Clink: When and How Human Services Workers Overcome Barriers to Care, 31(6), 页码范围1408-1431. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1358



6、进入持续优势的黄金时代:创业创造还是发现?


为了更好地了解企业持续卓越绩效的起源,我们考虑创业创造和发现的过程。发现新机会需要速度和灵活性,尽管许多发现很容易实现,但它们同样十分容易被模仿。相比之下,创造更加复杂、迭代和累积,尽管会使得实现这些机会的速度变慢,但更难复制。在对1966至2015年美国数据库人口进行正式模拟建模和分析时,我们发现进入持续优势黄金时代的双峰模式。其中一个是企业上市后的初始峰值,是由创业发现驱动的。另一个峰值是个长期的倒U形轨迹,大约在17年后达到最高点,是由创业创造驱动的。它先是使持久的优势成为可能,后来又限制了这种优势。我们的研究结果对持续优势、创业机会和战略更新的研究具有启示意义。


To better understand the origins of sustained superior firm performance, we consider processes of entrepreneurial creation and discovery. Discovering new opportunities requires speed and flexibility, and although many discoveries are easy to implement, this makes them easy to imitate. By comparison, creation is more complex, iterative, and cumulative, making these opportunities slower to implement yet harder to copy. In formal simulation modeling and analyses of the U.S. Compustat population from 1966 to 2015, we found a bimodal pattern of entry into golden eras of sustained superiority. One peak consisted of an initial spike as firms went public, and evidence suggests this was driven by entrepreneurial discovery. The other peak involved a long-term inverted U-shaped trajectory that reached its high point about 17 years later. Evidence suggests this was driven by entrepreneurial creation, which first enabled then later constrained durable superiority. Our results have implications for research on sustained superiority, entrepreneurial opportunities, and strategic renewal.


参考文献:Andrew D. Henderson, Melissa E. Graebner. (2020). Entering a Golden Age of Sustained Superiority: Entrepreneurial Creation or Discovery? 31(6), 1432-1451. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1357


picture from Internet


7、解开管理层的忧郁情绪:过去形成的期望如何影响新的工作


成为管理者通常被视为职业阶梯上非常令人垂涎的一步,并且与责任的提升相对应。然而,证据表明,有些人在晋升后会经历"管理忧郁",或对自己的管理工作感到失望。虽然过去的研究指出个人差异(如技能不足)或晋升情况(如非自愿)可能是造成这种忧郁的原因,但鲜为人知的是,人们对于过去工作的期望(如对责任需要的期望)如何影响他们的第一次管理经验。为了回答这个问题,我们比较了来自不同工作岗位的主管的经验,即前巴黎地铁司机(独立工作并影响他人的生活)和车站代理(相互依赖地工作,对他人的生活影响有限),不同的岗位让他们对责任有着截然不同的期望。通过访谈和观察,我们发现前司机有一种深刻的"个人"责任感。晋升后,与对个人责任感的期望相比,他们的管理责任感显得黯然失色,导致大多数人经历了管理上的忧郁。相比之下,前代理对责任需要什么没有期望,而一旦进入管理层,他们也并未表现出失望。总的来说,我们展示了期望印记如何影响人们未来的管理经验,包括他们的管理忧郁,并讨论了我们的发现对工作流动性和工作设计文献的启示。


Becoming a manager is generally seen as a highly coveted step up the career ladder that corresponds to a gain in responsibility. There is evidence, however, that some individuals experience “managerial blues,” or disenchantment with their managerial jobs after being promoted. Although past scholarship points to individual differences (such as skills inadequacy) or the promotion circumstances (such as involuntary) as possible explanations for such blues, less is known as to how the expectations that people carry with them from past jobs—such as expectations about what responsibility entails—may shape their first managerial experience. To answer this question, we compare the experiences of supervisors coming from different jobs—that is, former Paris subway drivers (working independently and impacting the lives of others) and station agents (working interdependently with limited impact on others’ lives)—that left them with distinct sets of expectations around responsibility. Drawing on interviews and observations, we find that former drivers developed a deep sense of “personal” responsibility. After promotion, their perceived managerial responsibility paled in comparison with their expectations of what it felt like to have personal responsibility, leading the majority to experience managerial blues. In contrast, former agents had few expectations of what responsibility entailed and reported no disenchantment once they joined the managerial ranks. Overall, we show how imprinted expectations shape people’s future managerial experiences, including their managerial blues, and discuss the implications of our findings for literatures on job mobility and job design.


参考文献:Nishani Bourmault , Michel Anteby. (2020). Unpacking the Managerial Blues: How Expectations Formedin the Past Carry into New Jobs, 31(6), 1452-1474. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1361



8、来自内部的力量:内部流动性和高绩效者保留


我们开发并测试了一个具有理论依据的、可概括的经验框架,用于评估内部和外部雇员之间的绩效差距。第一,人力资本理论预测内部雇员会比外部雇员更有效率。第二,情境学习理论预测内部雇员的效率会随着时间的推移而提高。第三,很少应用于本文的承诺理论预测,内部晋升会提升高绩效员工的保留率(“积极保留”)。采取通用的经验框架来量化这些机制对零售商(拥有109063名委托销售人员和12931名经理)的相对贡献后,我们发现设定中的差距主要是由积极的保留率驱动的:高绩效员工和内部雇员辞职的可能性更小,而且高绩效的内部员工最不可能辞职。当高绩效的内部员工辞职时,他们往往会引用与工作无关的理由,而不是晋升机会。研究人员和组织通常孤立地考察绩效和保留率,可能低估了内部晋升作为留住高绩效员工的手段的重要性。


We develop and test a theoretically informed and generalizable empirical framework for evaluating the performance gap between internally and externally hired workers. First, human capital theory predicts that internal hires will be immediately more productive than external hires. Second, contextual learning predicts that internal hires will be more productive with time. Finally, theories of commitment, which are rarely applied to this literature, predict that internal advancement enhances retention among high performers (“positive retention”). Applying a general empirical framework for quantifying the relative contributions of these mechanisms to a retailer with 109,063 commissioned salespeople and their 12,931 managers, we find that the gap in our setting is primarily driven by positive retention: High performers and internal hires are less likely to quit, and crucially, high-performing internal hires are especially unlikely to quit. When high-performing internal hires do quit, they tend to cite reasons unrelated to work rather than advancement opportunities. By typically examining performance and retention in isolation, researchers and organizations may be underestimating the importance of internal advancement as a means of retaining of high performers.


参考文献:Alan Benson , Ben A. Rissing. (2020). Strength from Within: Internal Mobility and the Retention of High Performers, 31(6), 1475-1496. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1362



9、群体决策的过度信任:通过群体和市场发现隐藏的信息


组织面临的一个关键挑战是如何有效地汇集信息。传统上的组织依赖于委员会和团队,但最近许多组织已经开始探索信息市场的使用。在本文中,作者对群体和市场在隐藏配置文件任务中汇集信息的能力进行了比较。在研究一中,当参与者之间没有利益冲突时,群体发现隐藏信息的表现优于市场,而当存在利益冲突时,市场的表现则优于群体。此外,与市场相比,参与者更相信团队能够发现隐藏信息。研究二将这些发现归纳为一个简单的预测任务,证实人们对群体的信任程度高于对市场的信任,并且这些结果没有受到利益冲突的限制。通过《Good Judgment Open》中经验丰富的预测人员,研究三发现与传统委员会相比,对市场的熟悉和经验增加了参与者对市场的认可和使用。


A crucial challenge for organizations is to pool and aggregate information effectively. Traditionally, organizations have relied on committees and teams, but recently many organizations have explored the use of information markets. In this paper, the authors compared groups and markets in their ability to pool and aggregate information in a hidden-profiles task. In Study 1, groups outperformed markets when there were no conflicts of interest among participants, whereas markets outperformed groups when conflicts of interest were present. Also, participants had more trust in groups to uncover hidden profiles than in markets. Study 2 generalized these findings to a simple prediction task, confirming that people had more trust in groups than in markets. These results were not qualified by conflicts of interest. Drawing on experienced forecasters from Good Judgment Open, Study 3 found that familiarity and experience with markets increased the endorsement and use of markets relative to traditional committees.


参考文献:Boris Maciejovsky, David V. Budescu. (2020). Too Much Trust in Group Decisions: Uncovering Hidden Profiles by Groups and Markets, 31(6), 1497-1514. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1363


picture from Internet


10、创造互惠互利情形以利用种族多元的劳动力:在广泛股票期权下,公司层面的种族多样性对财务和员工产出的影响


尽管学术界对企业劳动力的多样性给予了大量关注,但在理解企业层面的种族多样性是否或在何种背景下与企业的绩效和员工产出相关联方面,现有研究是有限的。根据社会相互依存理论、社会交换和心理所有权理论,我们建议对至少一半员工使用广泛的股票期权激励,从而为员工种族多样性与公司产出之间的积极关系创造条件。我们检验这一命题的方法是,分析155家申请“100家最适合工作的公司”比赛的企业的面板数据,以及2006年到2010年的五年间109314名员工的回答(354个公司年度观察)。研究结果显示,当公司采用广泛的股票期权时,种族多样性与之后的公司财务表现和个人情感承诺呈正相关,而与之后的自愿离职率没有显著相关。然而,在未使用广泛股票期权的情况下,种族多样性与较高的自愿离职率和较低的员工情感承诺显著相关,并且财务绩效没有提升。本文通过记录不同工作情境下财务激励的有益影响,扩展了关于绩效激励价值的理论。


Despite substantial scholarly attention to workforce demographic diversity, existing research is limited in understanding whether or in what contexts firm-level racial diversity relates to performance and workforce outcomes of the firm. Drawing on social interdependence theory along with insights from social exchange and psychological ownership theories, we propose that the use of broad-based stock options granted to at least half the workforce creates the conditions supporting a positive relationship between workforce racial diversity and firm outcomes. We examine this proposition by analyzing panel data from 155 companies that applied for the “100 Best Companies to Work For” competition with responses from 109,314 employees over the five-year period from 2006 to 2010 (354 company-year observations). Findings revealed that racial diversity was positively related to subsequent firm financial performance and individual affective commitment and was not significantly associated with subsequent voluntary turnover rates, when accompanied by a firm’s adoption of broad-based stock options. However, under the nonuse of broad-based stock options, racial diversity was significantly related to higher voluntary turnover rates and lower employee affective commitment, with no financial performance gains. By documenting the beneficial effects of financial incentives in diverse workplaces, this paper extends theory asserting the value of incentives for performance.


参考文献:Joo Hun Han, DuckJung Shin, William G. Castellano, Alison M. Konrad, Douglas L. Kruse, Joseph R. Blasi. (2020). Creating Mutual Gains to Leverage a Racially Diverse Workforce: The Effects of Firm-Level Racial Diversity on Financial and Workforce Outcomes Under the Use of Broad-Based Stock Options, 31(6), 1515-1537. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1360



11、大鱼,大池塘?正式和非正式核心/外围职位对创新产生的共同影响


在本文中,我们将核心/外围框架应用于组织内部情境,以研究正式和非正式核心/外围结构之间的相互作用。具体来说,我们思考发明者在大型跨国高科技公司的研发部门所占据的核心位置,会如何影响他们进行渐进式创新的能力。我们从理论和经验上观察到,正式和非正式的核心地位对渐进式创新的产生具有积极和独立的影响。当非正式知识共享网络中的核心发明人同时也隶属于核心组织单位时,这些影响将对创新生产率产生乘数效应。但是,我们也观察到,当这些联系延伸到非正式知识共享网络的核心之外时,处于非正式和正式结构核心的积极效应会被个人的知识联系分布负向调节。


In this paper, we apply a core/periphery framework to an intraorganizational context to study the interplay between formal and informal core/periphery structures. Specifically, we consider how core positions occupied by inventors in the corporate research and development division of a large multinational high-tech company affect their ability to generate incremental innovations. We theorize and empirically observe that formal and informal core positions have positive and independent effects on the generation of incremental innovations. These effects have a multiplicative impact on innovative productivity when inventors who are core in the informal knowledge-sharing network are also affiliated with a core organizational unit. We also observe, however, that the positive effect of being located at the core of both the informal and formal structures is negatively moderated by individuals’ distribution of knowledge ties when these reach outside the core of their informal knowledge-sharing network.


参考文献:Massimo Maoret , Marco Tortoriello , Daniela Iubatti. (2020). Big Fish, Big Pond? The Joint Effect of Formal and Informal Core/Periphery Positions on the Generation of Incremental Innovations, 31(6), 1538-1559. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1365


picture from Internet



12、早期创业孵化和指导可提升弱势企业家的学习,扩大规模与盈利能力


在社会和教育方面处于不利地位的企业家往往缺乏知识和先前的经验来壮大他们的业务。由于有限的教育和就业机会、贫穷和歧视,这些企业家的业务增长率和业绩往往较低。哪些因素会影响促进这些企业家的学习、规模和盈利能力提升的早期创业孵化和指导的有效性?在南非为低收入、弱势企业家服务的企业孵化器中进行的两项研究评估了这个问题。研究一使用匹配的、两阶段的案例对照研究设计,通过比较选定的孵化公司与相似的未孵化公司,来研究孵化对业务增长的影响。研究结果显示,从申请孵化器到结束的六个月时间里,已孵化企业的营收比未孵化企业增长22%,就业率比未孵化企业增长15%。研究二通过分析孵化器中随机分配给导师的七组参与者的数据,使用工具变量模型来评估导师在提高企业绩效中的作用。研究结果显示,被分配到高能力导师(相对于低能力导师)的参与者在孵化一年后的收入和利润分别高出3.2%和3.5%。此外,对于企业家缺乏入职前知识和经验的企业而言,接受指导的好处更为显著,这表明指导可以补充人力资本的缺口。这些发现对如何通过指导和创业早期孵化来支持弱势企业家及其业务具有启示意义。


Socially and educationally disadvantaged entrepreneurs often lack the knowledge and prior experience to develop and scale their businesses. Owing to limited educational and employment opportunities, poverty, and discrimination, these entrepreneurs frequently experience low business growth and performance. What factors influence the effectiveness of early-stage venture incubation and mentoring for promoting learning, scaling, and profitability among these entrepreneurs? Two studies in a business incubator serving low-income, underprivileged entrepreneurs in South Africa evaluate this question. Study 1 uses a matched, two-period case-control design to investigate the effects of incubation on business growth by comparing selected and incubated companies to similar also-selected but not incubated ones. The findings show that incubated companies grew 22% more in revenue and 15% more in employment than not incubated companies over the six months between applying to and graduating from the incubator. Study 2 uses instrumental-variable models to evaluate the role that mentoring played in improving business performance by analyzing data from seven cohorts of participants in the incubator randomly assigned to mentors. The findings show that participants assigned to high-ability (versus low-ability) mentors had 3.2% higher revenue and 3.5% higher profits one year after incubation. Further, the benefits of being mentored were more significant for businesses whose entrepreneurs had less pre-entry knowledge and experience, suggesting that mentoring supplemented gaps in human capital. These findings have implications for ways to support disadvantaged entrepreneurs and their businesses through mentoring and early-stage venture incubation.


参考文献:Valentina A. Assenova. (2020). Early-Stage Venture Incubation and Mentoring Promote Learning, Scaling, and Profitability Among Disadvantaged Entrepreneurs, 31(6), 1560-1578. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1367



13、建立阶段之后的印记:沉淀的印记如何随着时间发展


在这项研究中,我们以Selznick和Stinchcombe的基本观察为基础,即组织在其创立背景下具有的持久印记,并探索在创立期间形成的特征是如何随着时间的推移而持续下去的。为此,我们借鉴了一家社会企业的民族志,企业家们在创办后不久就离开了这家企业。在考察最初的组织印记是如何超越创业阶段发展的过程中,我们重点关注组织成员的行动和相互作用、创始人的印记、企业的新领导以及外部环境。我们开发的过程模型显示了组织印记是如何作为自上而下和自下而上力量相互作用的结果而发展的。首先,我们发现最初的印记是通过自下而上的印记强化机制传递的,其次,通过我们称之为印记改革和印记耦合的两个过程,企业在创立期后会进行重印,形成了一个沉淀的印记。我们的发现进一步说明,虽然最初的印记会留下痕迹,但它的功能和表现形式会随着时间而改变。


In this study, we build on the foundational observations of Selznick and Stinchcombe that organizations bear the lasting imprint of their founding context and explore how characteristics shaped during founding are coherently carried forward through time. To do so, we draw on an ethnography of a social venture where the entrepreneurs left soon after founding. In examining how an initial organizational imprint evolves beyond a venture’s founding phase, we focus on the actions and interactions of organizational members, the founders’ imprint, the venture’s new leadership, and the external environment. The process model we develop shows how the organizational imprint evolves as a consequence of the interplay between top-down and bottom-up forces. We first find that the initial imprint is transmitted through a bottom-up mechanism of imprint reinforcement, and second, that the venture is reimprinted after the founding period through two processes which we call imprint reforming and imprint coupling. The result of this is the formation of a sedimented imprint. Our findings further illuminate that, although the initial imprint sticks, its function and manifestation changes over time.


参考文献:Lien De Cuyper , Bart Clarysse, Nelson Phillips. (2020). Imprinting Beyond the Founding Phase: How Sedimented Imprints Develop over Time, 31(6), 1579-1600. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1372



14、人员流动与组织绩效:专家与通才的经验和组织工作结构的影响


本研究增进了对新员工在何种条件下能够改善组织绩效的理解。我们认为,新成员作为专家或通才工作经验的丰富程度是解释新成员加入后绩效改变的一个关键因素。我们将专家定义为那些专注于组织任务的特定组成部分的人,而通才则执行任务的所有组成部分。因此,专家必须与团队其他成员协调才能完成团队的任务,这就使得专家与其他成员之间的相互依赖性更强,并且比通才拥有更多的组织相关知识。我们预测(1)接受专家作为新成员加入的组织比接受通才的组织表现更差;(2)新成员的工作经验和接收者组织结构一致的时候(即专家加入专家小组,通才加入通才小组)会比不一致时表现更好。我们使用实验室研究来检验我们的假设,在实验中,我们操纵接受群体的新成员和现任成员作为专家或通才参与工作的程度。参与者在三人小组中以通才或专家的身份工作,并接收一位在另一小组中得到专家或通才经验的新成员。我们为假设找到了支持,并为潜在新成员的背景使他们能够对接收者群体做出重大贡献的机制提供了证据。在与接收者组织类似的结构中获得经验的新成员表示,他们与新小组的适应程度更高,这使得他们的接收者的表现要好于新成员的经验和接收团队结构不一致的小组。此外,我们的研究结果表明,通才比专家更有可能将知识传递给他们的新团队。


This study advances understanding of the conditions under which a new worker improves organizational performance. We argue that the extent to which new group members have experience working as specialists or generalists is a critical factor in explaining performance after the new member joins. We conceptualize specialists as those who concentrate on a particular component of an organization’s task, whereas generalists perform all components of the task. As such, a specialist must coordinate with other group members to complete the group’s task, which makes a specialist more interdependent with other members and in possession of more organization-specific knowledge than a generalist. We predict that (1) groups receiving specialist new members do not perform as well after the new member joins as compared with groups receiving generalist new members and (2) groups with new members whose work experience and recipient group structure are aligned (i.e., generalist movers into generalist groups and specialist movers into specialist groups) perform better than groups with new members whose experience and recipient group structure are not aligned. We test our hypotheses using a laboratory study in which we manipulate the extent to which new members and incumbent members of recipient groups work as specialists or generalists. Participants work as generalists or specialists in three-person groups and receive a new member who acquired experience as a specialist or generalist in another group. We find support for our hypotheses and provide evidence on mechanisms through which potential new members’ backgrounds enable them to contribute significantly to their recipient groups. New members who acquire experience in a structure similar to that of their recipient organizations report that they experience greater fit with their new groups, which enables their recipient groups to perform better than groups where new members’ experience and recipient group structure are not aligned. Additionally, our results suggest generalists may be more likely than specialists to transfer knowledge to their new groups.


参考文献:Erin Fahrenkopf , Jerry Guo , Linda Argote. (2020). Personnel Mobility and Organizational Performance: The Effects of Specialist vs. Generalist Experience and Organizational Work Structure, 31(6), 1601-1620. doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1373




解析作者:小白菜

推荐

订阅


点击“阅读原文”发现更多未推送管理学论文导读!

↓↓↓