-
Need for Speed? International Transmission Latency, Liquidity and Volatility
-
Ambiguous Text
-
Psychological Barrier and Cross-firm Return Predictability
-
Does Safety Uncertainty Affect Acquisitions?
1、Need for Speed? International Transmission Latency, Liquidity and Volatility
Working paper
,
issued in May 2019.
Khaladdin Rzayev;
University of Edinburgh
Using a measure of the transmission latency between exchanges in Frankfurt and
London and exploiting speed-inducing technological upgrades, we investigate the impact of
international transmission latency on liquidity and volatility. We find that a decrease in
transmission latency increases liquidity and volatility. In line with existing theoretical models,
we show that the amplification of liquidity and volatility is associated with variations in adverse
selection risk and aggressive trading. We then investigate the net economic effect of high
latency and find that the liquidity deterioration effect of high latency dominates its volatility
reducing effect. This implies that the liquidity enhancing benefit of increased trading speed in
financial markets outweighs its volatility-inducing effect.
原文链接:
thttps://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=AFAPS2020&paper_id=13
Working paper
,
issued in
June 2019
.
Eric Tham,
EDHEC
Text is inherently ambiguous. Yet investors read textual news as the primary
source of financial information from the financial news and social media. I used Natural Language Processing on social and financial media text to construct a natural
event and Big Data ambiguity measurement. The ambiguity measurement is derived
from a mixture of distributions model that distinguishes from disagreement between
the two sources. A binomial tree model of ambiguity is then proposed that explains
salient points of ambiguity on asset pricing in empirical tests in this paper and in Brenner and Izhakian (2018). The paper finds that the financial news media have a bigger
influence on asset prices than social media except in recent periods of recessions. The
paper provides a market-wide and natural event evidence of agents’ maxmin utility
optimisation behavior in Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989).
原文链接:
https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=AFAPS2020&paper_id=18
3、Psychological Barrier and Cross-firm Return Predictability
Working paper
,
issued in May 2019.
Shiyang Huang,
University of Hong Kong
Tse-Chun Lin,
University of Hong Kong
Hong Xiang,
University of Hong Kong
We provide a psychological explanation for the delayed price response to news about economically
linked firms. We show that the return predictability of economically linked firms depends on the
nearness to the 52-week high. The interaction between news about economically linked firms and the
nearness to 52-week high can partially explain the underreaction to news about customers, geographic
neighbors, industry peers, or foreign industries. We further examine how anchoring on the 52-week
high affects belief updating regarding analyst recommendation. We find that analysts react to news
about economically linked firms but that anchoring on the 52-week high reduces such reactions.
原文链接:
https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=AFAPS2020&paper_id=19
4、Does Safety Uncertainty Affect Acquisitions?